Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Topic: NCTM philosophy
Replies: 32   Last Post: Aug 6, 1995 4:41 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Norm Krumpe

Posts: 53
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: NCTM philosophy
Posted: Aug 2, 1995 6:20 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

>I don't think the calculator has any place in the K-4 math class. It
>serves nothing and it is harmful for the child math well being. Even in
>high school the use of calculators in math class has to be with great
>caution. I have recently helped several very bright students who were
>just the victims of the abuse of calculators in math class. I have
>described one of the example before so I will not repeat here.
>


If K-4 Mathematics Education were strictly about teaching students how to do
pencil/paper calculations, then I would agree with you wholeheartedly. But
I think there is much more to math ed. than that. Calculators allow the
possibility of exploring patterns that would be far too unmanagable to
explore by hand. Calculators allow students to deal with real problems
without bogging them down in the computation part of the problem (which is
*sometimes* the least significant part of a problem).

How many students in K-4 have money in a savings account? Is the K-4 level
capable of learning about how and how much interest is accumulated on the
money they are saving? Is it practical for them to learn about interest by
sitting there with pencil and paper and churning out numbers while the
teacher tells them if their results are correct or incorrect?

How about iteration? What happens "in the long run" if you begin with a
factor, say 4, and *repeatedly* multiply by 0.99? This seems to me a
legitimate K-4 exploration (leaning more toward 3-4 than K-2) that would be
far too tedious to do by hand, but easy to explore and discover by handheld
calculator.

You mentioned that you "helped several very bright students who were just
the victims of the abuse of calculators in math class." I noticed that you
used the word *abuse* which means "bad use" rather than using the word
"use." And once again, I will reiterate that calculators *can* have a
negative effect if used *improperly.*

Norm Krumpe







Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.