Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.



Re(4): re:Annenburg Math/Sciece list
Posted:
Aug 6, 1995 4:20 AM


Ted Alper alper@ockham.stanford.edu wrote . . .
> [. . . my previous post making fun of Kent's quiz . . .]<
>Oh, come on. I would hope that everyone on this list (save the person >who couldn't think of any *uses* for the angle addition formulas) would >consider this sort of material an essential PART of a trigonometry >course  certainly it's hard to believe that anyone who couldn't do these >problems could be considered to have mastered trigonometry.
Yes, and I also received a personal reply from Mr. Luteman admonishing me for my "glibness" and informing me of the high level of achievment expected and obtained at the institution where he teaches, of which I have no doubt.
I received only two A+s in my entire time in high school. One was in probability, the other in trigonometry. I was subjected to countless quizzes and tests of the type described in the original post. I happen to be good at taking tests. I must confess, here in NCTML for all to see, that at the present time I remember virtually none of my trig  were I required to teach it I would have to learn it all over again first. I consider it my responsibility to my students try my utmost to present material to them in such a way that they might not only retain it, but perhaps even enjoy it.
>Now, how much class time should be spent on this is another story  but >there's nothing a priori wrong with a few minutes at the start of class, >or "hundreds of these type problems" over the course of a semester. >Having this stuff at your fingertips makes understanding the juicier >things much easier, and not understanding this stuff makes all the rest >a vague noise.
Again, having set all glibness aside, I agree. I'd like to ask Kent a serious question or two now. How much class time *do* you spend on this, and more significantly, how much are these quizzes weighted in evaluation? Are they diagnostic, or summative? Are they also used (formally) to evaluate the effectiveness of the program?
I did not mean to suggest that quizzes are a priori wrong  indeed they are a usefull tool that I employ quite liberally. However, I would weight one word problem in which students had to choose correctly from six (or more) methods to solve a problem (or just invent one that works) more heavily than a semester or a year's worth of highstress, lowcognitivelevel quizzes. I would also suggest that there are *many* other ways to practice algorithms and to assess students' mastery thereof.
Richard Fouchaux

Faculty of Education FirstClass Server EduServ.EDU.YorkU.CA via ExpressNet/SMTP



