Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: negative * negative
Replies: 11   Last Post: Apr 5, 1996 6:02 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 JansonEdit@aol.com Posts: 18 Registered: 12/6/04
Re: negative * negative
Posted: Apr 3, 1996 8:53 AM

I'm surprised no one has mentioned the following. (I have heard it explained
this way several times; I feel there are some disadvantages to it, but I'll
let others articulate them if they so desire.)

In mathematics, definitions that are difficult to apply to concrete models
often are developed to be consistent with already established patterns.
(Aside: In higher arithmetic, for example, we expand nonnegative integer
exponents into negative integer exponents and then to rational exponents.)
We agree that positive times negative is negative (yes?). Then, for
example,

3*-3=-9
2*-3=-6
1*-3=-3
0*-3=0

In each case when we add subtract one to the first factor, the product is
increased by 3. Now, to keep the pattern consistent, -1*-3 must be....

(Of course, the introduction would have to be reworded for elementary

Eric Karnowski

Date Subject Author
4/1/96 MAXINE BRIDGER
4/2/96 Judy Austin
4/2/96 Daniel Ray DIALUP
4/2/96 Chih-Han sah
4/2/96 John Sheehan
4/2/96 W Gary Martin
4/3/96 JansonEdit@aol.com
4/3/96 Lou Talman