The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Re: Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
David Scott Powell

Posts: 54
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II
Posted: Feb 16, 1995 1:19 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

>Date: Thu, 16 Feb 1995 12:19:43 -0600
> (David Scott Powell)
>Subject:Re: Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II

>>> >Does anyone know of any research dealing with the sequence of Algebra I,
>>> >Geometry, Algebra II?

>>Well, of course there is the work the van Hieles did in the Netherlands in
>>60s, which is to some extent responsible for current geometry practice in the
>>United States and elsewhere. Sorry I cannot give a specific reference, but
>>info should be readily available.

>Funny you should mention van Hiele levels. Zalman Usiskin did some work on
>that very topic in 1982 or 1983 in which he concluded that the learning of
>geometry does not depend on maturity but depends on how the subject is taught.
>So this would probably say that teaching geometry to 9th graders is o.k. as
>long as the teaching/learning model fits the van Hiele model. Does this help?

Scott Powell
University Lab School
1776 University Ave.
Honolulu, HI 96826

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.