Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Topic: meaningful standards
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
roitman@oberon.math.ukans.edu

Posts: 243
Registered: 12/6/04
meaningful standards
Posted: Jun 1, 1995 2:38 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply


>
>When you say things go a lot better if you have students do little projects
>in which they are forced to grapple with situations underlying difficult
>concepts *before* the concepts are defined, does this mean you have tried
>teaching these same concepts without having students do little projects
>first? If so....and you find that spending the time on the projects works
>better....then without a doubt you should continue using these little
>projects. If doing these projects prior to introducing the concept forces
>you to teach only 3/4 the curriculum due to the time the projects require,
>would that influence your decision on continuing these projects?
>
>Take Care Harvey Becker



You've set up a false dichotomy, Harvey.

I have taught the course both ways. Before we did the little projects at
least half of the students did lousy on complicated ideas (stuff like lim
sup and lim inf for those who learned & remember college analysis) and
proofs (getting straight what the hypothesis was, what they were trying to
prove, etc.) The first time I did the little projects the class was a real
bunch of, you should excuse the expression, losers -- about 25% had flunked
it previously at least once, at least half had math grades with an average
below a B, only one showed any mathematical promise (in this class you
expect about 1/3 of the students to be pretty good). Well we *did* cover
everything I'd ever covered in the class -- as usual in my classes with at
least 2 classes to spare for review for the final. Except for a few
students who didn't do any work everyone got an honest B in the class;
their performance was much better on average than the performance of
previous classes that were better prepared.

For those who are curious about time, we spent about 20 minutes a week on
little projects; classes here generally meet for 3 hours a week. So 1/9 of
our time was spent on the little projects. Naturally this would vary with
subject, grade, particular bunch of students, etc. But a little sure went
a very long way.

You *can* have your cake and eat it too.


====================================
Judy Roitman, Mathematics Department
Univ. of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66049
roitman@math.ukans.edu
=====================================











Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.