Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Topic: standards War
Replies: 3   Last Post: Jun 5, 1995 12:14 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Pat Ballew

Posts: 64
Registered: 12/6/04
standards War
Posted: Jun 4, 1995 11:39 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Realizing that commenting here can bring on sustained abuse, I still
felt that I wanted to inject a few comments. Before doing so I will try
to present some background that may help focus the ideas I wish to present.
I was an early and enthusiastic supporter of the present mathematics
reform movement, speaking at conferences and doing in-services as early as
82 (I think we called it the agenda for action back then). I continued to
be very active until around 1992 or 93 when I first felt that the focus had
somehow changed. I still practice and support many of the ideas that I feel
were part of the "early reform " (a term I can not define in a short time)
Over the next few years I tried to come to grips with my
growing concerns over the direction of the reform movement.
I believe that most math teachers involvement with the mathematics
reform was primarily driven by a perceived lack of student acquired
knowledge
and understanding. The goals and motivation were predominantly to answer
the
eternal question, why can't Johnny (Joanie) count?

Since those early days when I felt that was the focus that was central to
the NCTM reform, it has been integrated with other education
reform movements with social goals and motivations totally apart
from, and possibly at odds with, the acquisition of acquired knowledge and
understanding of mathematics. Cooperative learning is one such example.
My perception, founded or unfounded, is that there is a PC tone
to the NCTM now. Despite lip service to teacher experimentation and
independence, the tone is "We are right and they are wrong", and this moves
us away from teacher empowerment and independence.
I also see a change in the focus of grading policies which tends to
denegrate acquired knowledge, the very measure which for years was used to
trumpet the need for a new and better way of teaching and learning.
I see stong suggestions for grading policies driven by a social
vision rather than social history, of how people "ought to be" rather than
how they are. I have observed a pressure for adoption of
classroom management styles which produce manufactured success by approving
everything, which supports nothing. This seems to make extra motivation,
interest, or knowledge meaningless, and the lack of it acceptable.
I think lots of people feel they would like to support part of the
reform movement and still feel free to discuss the parts they feel are
wrong without being lambasted with all the trite phrases.
I would like to use John Saxon's books, augmented by the curriculum
addenda series from NCTM and adapted with my own ideas about technology and
visualization and concept development. I would like to feel that people who
disagree can tell me about the ideas they think work well for them without
bemoaning my lack of culture, courage, or common sense.

OK fire away, if I can't take it I know where the kill switch is located.








Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.