Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Topic: tracking & remediation
Replies: 2   Last Post: Mar 13, 1995 10:45 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
roitman@oberon.math.ukans.edu

Posts: 243
Registered: 12/6/04
tracking & remediation
Posted: Mar 2, 1995 2:37 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Do I have an opinion on tracking/remediation etc? Not fixed in concrete --
I like what Mark Saul says and I like what I see in good heterogeneous
classes too.

But my kid is dyslexic and I am incredibly grateful for his being in a
special LD English class right now in junior high, and very concerned about
inclusion doing away with these classes next year. Some kids have
knowledge deficits, sometimes needing a lot of work (like LD), sometimes
only short term (didn't pay attention when fractions were taught).
Remediation -- doing the same thing as before -- obviously doesn't work.
But someone needs to give these kids special help in a situation where they
don't feel like outliers, and with the attitude (which Mark obviously has)
that they're not dumb, not doomed, but expected to eventually learn what
everyone else is learning, just maybe not in the same order and in the same
time frame.

Years of having essentially the same expectations RIGHT NOW as the other
kids in elementary school have destroyed my son's motivations and his
belief that he can do well in school. While LD is obviously an extreme
case, it's still on the continuum, and there are a lot of kids with
similar, but less dramatic, problems.

How do we meet the needs of all kids? That's what the Standards asks us to
do. And I think flexibility is what's needed. This kid is appropriately
in a heterogeneous situation here but not there -- that kind of thing. If
all of our classes are taught with the goal that all students will (not
just can, but will) learn at a high level, and if none of our classes are
designed as dead-ends, then we don't have to be doctrinaire but can really
look hard at individual kids and what's best for them.

Thanks for listening.


====================================
Judy Roitman, Mathematics Department
Univ. of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66049
roitman@math.ukans.edu
=====================================











Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.