Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.
|
|
Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
Education
»
math-teach
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Bauersfeld and "the reality illusion"
Replies:
2
Last Post:
Oct 29, 1995 6:30 PM
|
 |
|
|
Bauersfeld and "the reality illusion"
Posted:
Oct 29, 1995 9:31 AM
|
|
At the risk of foisting more of that ol' devil philosophy on readers of this list, I'd like to offer the following quotation from Heinrich Bauersfeld's essay "'Language Games' in the Mathematics Classroom: Their Function and Their Effect" which appears in THE EMERGENCE OF MATHEMATICAL MEANING: Interaction in Classroom Cultures, edited by Bauersfeld and Paul Cobb:
The reproduction of the reality illusion, the belief in the verbal transport of knowledge and direct learning and teaching, still is a very common feature in the early school years--with devastating consequences. Under the pressures from limited time, prescribed curricula, and external control, and driven by their own engagement, ambitions, and anxieties, the teachers are inclined to replace the necessary dealing with the students' subjectively constructed meanings with the conventionalized exchange of symbols with poor taken-as-shared meanings and definitions. 'There is abundand anecdotal evidence that much of what happens in school is driven by a need to maintain bureaucratic and institutional norms rather than scholarly norms' (Pintrich, Marx, & Boyle, 1993, p. 193). In particular, the teachers' internalized obligation to maintain a smooth, productive, and steady flow of the classroom processes functions toward a curtailment of the negotiations and toward their their replacement by routines for the direct production of wanted actions and related verbal descriptions. Too many teachers fall victim to the reality illusion: 'recitation' (Hoetker & Albrand, 1969) and the 'funnel pattern' (Bauersfeld, 1978, 1988), in which instruction dominates over interaction. The effects are well known; mathematics is not only the most hated school subject for many students, it is also the most ineffective one as well. [p.276]
Somehow, the above passage seems relevant to several of the threads we've been pursuing recently, at least to my mind. One more short quotation seems equally important:
"There is no simple pointing at something and naming it adequately, because what is seen and recognized can be reasonably different with each of the students. Teachers often forget these differences by requesting 'Just look at it!' as if an array of beads or sticks or any other didactical means such as signs, models, or embodiments were self-speaking issues." [p.278]
How many of us have heard those dreaded words in a mathematics classroom, "It's obvious that. . . " and wondered why we were too dense to see what "everybody" else could? How many of us have used those same or similar words in our own mathematics teaching? Food for thought on this 25 hour day.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |Michael Paul Goldenberg |University of Michigan 310 E. Cross St. |School of Education 4002 Ypsilanti, MI 48198 |Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1259 (313) 482-9585 |(313) 747-2244 | |"Truth is a mobile army of metaphors." |Friedrich Nietzsche |---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|