The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: The Role of Standardized Exams, SF Chronicle
Replies: 4   Last Post: May 29, 2001 9:23 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Victor Steinbok

Posts: 858
Registered: 12/3/04
Re: The Role of Standardized Exams, SF Chronicle
Posted: May 29, 2001 8:12 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

One could also add that there is an article in the Washington Post
this morning that contradicts much of Clopton and Evers propaganda.

When Clock Beats Curriculum
Caught Between Expanding Subject Areas and Standardized Testing,
Teachers and Students Feel Time Squeeze

By Valerie Strauss
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, May 29, 2001; Page A09

Tara Allen began the school year planning to teach her fifth-grade
class an important math unit on probability and the novel "Bridge
to Terabithia," but she won't get to introduce either. Time is running out.

Daniel Dara Din, a freshman at the University of Virginia, is
learning history he didn't get to study before he graduated last year
from Chantilly High School in Fairfax County. "Drilled into my mind
over the years were Virginia history, Colonial history and
history up to the Civil War," Din said, "but there was no time for
much of anything past World War II."

Time. There never seems to be enough of it, at least for the legions
of teachers who realize with dismay at this time of year that there
are too few days and too much left to teach. In classrooms from coast
to coast, teachers are rushing to finish the curriculum; in
others, they simply give up trying.

"Those people who say they do get it all done, I just don't how they
do it," said Allen, of Bywood Elementary School in Upper
Darby, Pa. "If you try to get to it all, then everything suffers. We
never get to the Civil War, for example, and we are supposed to."

The end-of-school rush is hardly a new phenomenon, but educators say
it is more frenzied than ever.

"We have a tendency in American education to continue to add more
expectations and more curriculum," said Bill Kein,
superintendent of the 4,200-student Mercer Island School District in
Washington state. "It is easier to add than take away. So things
are worse today than in the past."

Although many teachers say they complete everything during the school
year -- Cynthia Mosteller, an eighth-grade civics teacher at
Deal Middle School in the District, said that in 15 years of
teaching, "I've never not finished the course" -- others admit having
success. The reasons, according to teachers, administrators and students:

* Despite efforts to create a standard curriculum, many teachers
still have personal topic preferences and often dwell on what they
know best, rushing through units on which they are less versed.

* Students don't learn at the same pace, and some concepts take
longer for students to absorb than others. School schedules no
longer build in much, if any, time for review or serious thought,
educators say.

"One of the major things we aren't building into the school day and
school year is time for reflection," said Chip Wood, of the
Northeast Foundation for Children, a Massachusetts-based nonprofit
organization dedicated to improving teaching. "Without that,
students just rush from one thing to the next, the way us grown-ups do."

* Standardized testing now cuts into teaching time -- Maryland
students in various grades take an entire week of such tests a year --
and teachers find it difficult to refocus students on learning after
spring tests, for which the curriculum is geared.

Virginia students took Standards of Learning tests last week, for
example, and said one teacher, who asked not to be identified:
"Once testing is over, the students as well as teachers think that
learning is over."

* There is more content than ever to teach, especially in subjects
such as biology, where new discoveries have vastly changed the
scope and face of knowledge. Yet nobody has narrowed the curriculum,
and the proliferation of standards has not helped the
situation either, despite a common assumption that those who draw up
standards take into account the time it takes to teach them.

Apparently they don't. A 1999 study conducted by the Colorado-based
Midcontinent Research for Education and Learning Lab
showed that teachers would need twice the time now allocated to
adequately cover all the material required by state standards.

In three states -- Colorado, Wyoming and North Dakota -- teachers
would need 1,100 hours of instructional time to address the
standards in four main areas, though there are 630 to 720 hours of
instruction time available in a school year, the study showed.

"The challenge at the school level is discerning the most essential
standards," said Douglas B. Reeves, of the Colorado-based Center
for Performance Assessment.

But Lesli Adler, who teaches Advanced Placement biology at Montgomery
County's Thomas S. Wootton High School, said nobody
is doing that.

"There is not less information to know; there's more," she said.
"History is in the same boat as science. . . . Look at national and
state standards. All seem reasonable until you come under the burden
of having to teach them all."

AP curriculum -- which offers high school students the equivalent of
a first-year introductory college course -- is a case in point.
"They say you don't need to teach everything, but they don't tell you
what to leave out," Adler said.

Lee Jones, executive director of the College Board's AP program,
acknowledges the problem. Several years ago, he said, in a bid to
try to narrow the AP curriculum, he asked colleges and universities
what they taught. In calculus, there was a consensus on how to
refocus the material, but in biology, he said, answers were all over
the map. Thus, nothing was changed.

"History and biology and chemistry to some degree are content-heavy,"
he said. "It's been very hard to find ways to kind of narrow
or limit the course without leaving out the same thing the colleges
and universities would think is important."

As a result, students wind up with knowledge gaps. Matt Randon is a
senior at Robinson Secondary School in Fairfax County, and
he laments that he has learned "the number of moles in a sample of
uranium" but not "much about Martin Luther King other than a
few bolded words in a textbook in elementary school and middle school."

Allen, the fifth-grade teacher, has learned to accept that she won't
get everything done. She is using techniques that stress using the
final six weeks of school for reinforcement of content learned and closure.

Time for new instruction is cut in half, she said, in part because
her fifth-graders are so anxious about leaving school that it is hard
for them to concentrate. So they are reflecting on what they learned
and designing memory books to help them.

"You start to see them settle," she said. "They seem less anxious.
It's more fun. And they seem to be more at peace, because you
aren't making the last six weeks chaotic and frustrating by trying to rush."

For the latest news and online discussions about schools and
parenting, go to The Washington Post's Web site and click on

© 2001 The Washington Post Company

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.