The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Escobales on Ralston - AMS Notices, Aug 2004
Replies: 1   Last Post: Jul 19, 2004 9:16 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Domenico Rosa

Posts: 455
Registered: 12/4/04
Re: Escobales on Ralston - AMS Notices, Aug 2004
Posted: Jul 19, 2004 9:16 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:09:02 -0700, Wayne Bishop wrote:
>That paper is easily available: <a


> ----------------------------------------------------------
>Notices of the AMS August 2004, Vol 51, N0 7
>Letters to the Editor <a


>Paper-and-Pencil Math


>Recently a student of mine came to my office for help in baby
>calculus. One of the problems had the expression 3(2/3). Naturally,
>I cancelled the two factors of 3 and said that the answer was 2.
>The student did not see why. So I wrote the equivalent improper
>fraction 6/3, and then it was clear to the student that the answer
>was indeed 2. This otherwise intelligent student had used
>calculators extensively since fifth grade at a very good school.
>This is an example of what I mean by ““calculator-assisted
>mathematical incompetence””.

Far from being an anecdotal item, the above is indicative of the grim
pseudo-education that has been promoted, with such extensive funding,
under the guise of "world-class education," "21st-century
mathematics," and "using technology to solve real-world problems."

I will add "calculator-assisted mathematical incompetence" to my

Dom Rosa

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.