The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Policy and News » mathed-news

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Tests: Dumbing down learning
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
Jerry P. Becker

Posts: 16,576
Registered: 12/3/04
Tests: Dumbing down learning
Posted: Jan 18, 2000 10:20 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

From the Los Angeles Times, Tuesday, January 18, 2000
Testing Mania Comes at a Cost

Lost in the shuffle is the dumbing down of genuine learning.

By Peter Sacks

We are a nation of testing junkies, starting with our toddlers, some of
whom take IQ tests for admission to kindergarten. Many Americans encounter
a lifetime of standardized testing in schools, colleges and workplaces.

What good does this testing really do? Following the lead of many states,
Gov. Gray Davis is hellbent on creating a test that California
high-schoolers must pass in order to graduate. Testing companies initially
balked at developing such a test, fearful of the potential liability of
tossing together a politically driven test of such major consequences.

California should pause and take a look at Texas. Nowhere is the
accountability movement more dominant than there, where each spring
schoolchildren take the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills. Sophomores
must pass the TAAS "exit test" in order to graduate -- regardless of the
academic records they compiled over 11 years in the state's school system.
Under the leadership of Texas Gov. George W. Bush, the TAAS test has
reshaped the state's educational enterprise. It also has deepened class and
race divisions in Texas schools.

Crusaders for school accountability and tougher standards often point to
Texas as the model for school improvement in the United States. Recently,
these crusaders were bolstered by a federal judge's long-awaited ruling
that use of the TAAS test does not unconstitutionally harm the state's
minority schoolchildren. Whether the Texas model is educationally sound,
however, is another question altogether.

In the 20 years prior to the first TAAS exit tests in the early 1990s, some
60% of black and Latino students made it from the 9th grade to graduation
three years later. Now that figure is half -- roughly 100,000 to 200,000
fewer. A study by Walter Haney, professor of education at Boston College,
suggests that the TAAS roadblock can be blamed for this disparity.

These TAAS barriers might well be worth the effort if there were good
evidence that a student's performance on the test had a meaningful
connection to his or her chances of success in the classroom or beyond in
the real world. In Texas, as in most states that have built such formidable
testing systems, such evidence is slim to nonexistent.

Indeed, wherever you find a high-stakes school achievement test in which
scores are tied to high school graduation, teacher promotion or
accreditation by the state, you will find all manner of "teaching the test"
drills that have little to do with real learning.

In fact, some research indicates that just the opposite occurs. Dozens of
studies from sources as diverse as the National Research Council, the Rand
Corp., the Educational Testing Service and independent researchers have
demonstrated that large-scale testing attached to major, life-changing
consequences simply serves to dumb down and trivialize student learning.

For their part, Texas officials point to declines in the gaps between
minority and white pass-rates in recent years. For example, this year 86%
of white students passed the TAAS, compared to 60% of African American
students. While it is true that this is less than the 36-point difference
in pass-rates between the two groups five years ago, it is not surprising
that rates have improved for African Americans, given that TAAS rules Texas
classrooms with an iron fist. Teachers report spending inordinate amounts
of valuable instruction time prepping for the TAAS exams.

Who really wins in this unrelenting push for more testing at ever-higher
stakes? Over the past three years, I've scoured the research and have
talked to dozens of students, teachers and parents, and the answer seems
depressingly clear: elected representatives who have capitalized on voter
outcry for tougher standards and greater accountability.

Americans who fall for this political rhetoric fail to understand that this
testing mania comes at the cost of genuine learning and sustained
achievement. If California parents and taxpayers were to look below the
surface of tough talk by the likes of Gov. Davis, Gov. Bush and others,
they would discover that the standardized testing movement is built on
smoke and mirrors, helpful only to career politicians and large testing

The sad part is that, at day's end, schoolchildren are the losers.
Peter Sacks Is the Author of "Standardized Minds: the High Price of
America's Testing Culture and What We Can Do to Change It" (Perseus Books,

Jerry P. Becker
Dept. of Curriculum & Instruction
Southern Illinois University
Carbondale, IL 62901-4610 USA
Fax: (618) 453-4244
Phone: (618) 453-4241 (office)
(618) 457-8903 (home)


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.