The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Inactive » NCTM Standards 2000 A

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Number sense
Replies: 10   Last Post: Apr 7, 2001 2:12 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Marc Lewis

Posts: 4
Registered: 12/8/04
Number sense
Posted: Dec 9, 1998 11:14 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In reviewing the Chapter 3 Overview to the Standards I feel there is a
definite need for a standard on what is called "Number Sense." The
first reference to this that I have seen is in an article by Joseph
Mercer in Sept. 92 Mathematics Teacher titled "What is left to teach
if students can use calculators?" Number sense is the ability of
people to interpret the answers they get from caluclators or
paper-and-pencil methods and determine whether the answer is
applicable to the problem. Calculators give correct answers, but only
to the problems plugged in. If the students do not know what the
proper operation is or order of operations or even what numbers to
use, they will get answers which make no sense.

I taught in high school for two years before returning to the
University of Georgia for my Master's. I taught Applied Math and
asked this question on a test: If there are 50 minutes in a class
period, how many seconds are there? Calculators were provided and the
unit we were completing was on convesions. We had spent two weeks in
this section, doing a variety of activities. Some of the answers I
got back were ridiculous. Several students answered "0.833333." They
had taken 50 and divided by 60. Now if I asked them to interpret that
I don't think they would have realized that they were saying the
school day last approximately 6 seconds! Time is something relevant
to all people, and for these not to understand the meaning of their
answer shows that they have no number sense.

I appreciated the Standards 2000 in that in the Overview you can read
in one paragraph the focus of K-2, 3-5, 6-8, and 9-12. The problem
with the old Standards is that if you were reading about the 9-12
geometry standard and you wanted to see what they focused on in 5-8
you had to flip back 60 pages. It is nice to see the flow here. Also
I appreciate that the grades are now broken into four categories. I
feel that standard dealing with number sense would be beneficial on
all leveles.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.