I'm also concerned about this conference. It appears to me that those of us who oppose the the new frameworks and support standards more in line with NCTM are being outflanked by some savvy organizers at DOE. Does anyone know any of these people well enough to discuss this with them directly?
On 10 Jan 2001, Nella LaRosa-Waters wrote: >On 10 Jan 2001, Bill Kendall wrote: >>If at least some of the people are as good a Peg says, then why >aren't >>they all, and why are no practioners on the panel? >> > >Should there be an attempt to speak to these people,(aside from >Schmid) at some point before the conference? I'm just a little >nervous that the people who are running the conference to present >their frameworks picked these people. Given the history, something >doesn't quite fit here.