Ring Theory - a Telescoping ProblemDate: 01/20/2002 at 16:30:59 From: VAH Subject: Abstract Algebra - Ring Theory An element a in a ring R is said to be nilpotent if there exists a positive integer n such that a^n = 0. Show that if a is nilpotent, a-1 is a unit. a-1 is a unit if there is an element b such that (a-1).b = 1, I tried various approaches. One was to rewrite a^n = 0 as a.(a^(n-1)) = 0, but I don't seem to be able to make progress. I'm not sure if I should approach it this way: a^n = 0, so a^n - 1 = -1 and a^n - 1^n = -1, then write it in the form (a-1)(a^(n-1) - 1^(n-1)... I would appreciate any assistance. Thank you, VAH Date: 01/20/2002 at 23:49:22 From: Doctor Paul Subject: Re: Abstract Algebra- Ring Theory Hi Veronica. Thanks for writing to Ask Dr. Math. Your efforts are valiant, but they're not going to lead to a solution. Sometimes it's best to approach a problem like this by actually constructing an inverse manually. It helps to be able to recognize a telescoping problem when you see one. Let's suppose n = 3. Then we want: (a - 1) * ( ) = 1 Surely we must use the fact that a^3 = 0. So what if we try this: (a - 1) * (a^2 ) = 1 This gives a^3 - a^2 = 1. This is fine, but it adds an extra -a^2 term, and our desired 1 is nowhere in sight. Can we get rid of the -a^2? I think we can. Consider: (a - 1) * (a^2 + a ) = 1 Now we have: a^3 + a^2 - a^2 - a = 1 a^3 - a = 1 This is fine, but it adds an extra -a term, and we still don't have the 1 we want. Can we get rid of the extra -a? Yes: (a - 1) * (a^2 + a + 1) = 1 a^3 + a^2 + a - a^2 - a - 1 = 1 a^3 - 1 = 1 Well, we're close. We got -1 instead of 1 so all we need to do is multiply everything by negative one and we'll be done: (a - 1) * (-a^2 - a - 1) = 1 So this works for n = 3. This is called a "telescoping" series because all of the terms vanish except the first and the last one. And in this special case, the first term also vanishes. And this leaves just the desired 1. Do you see that in the general case, the inverse of (a - 1) will be: (-a^[n-1] - a^[n-2] - .... - a^2 - a - 1). I hope this helps. Please write back if you'd like to talk about this more. - Doctor Paul, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/ Date: 01/21/2002 at 08:51:55 From: VAH Subject: Abstract Algebra - Ring Theory Doctor Paul, Thank you so much for your explanation. I was surprised by the speed of the response too. Thanks again, VAH |
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]
Ask Dr. Math^{TM}
© 1994- The Math Forum at NCTM. All rights reserved.
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/