Associated Topics || Dr. Math Home || Search Dr. Math

### Weather Forecasting

```
Date: 05/24/97 at 11:44:56
From: Brett
Subject: Probability (Conditional Prob. and Independence)

I have a hard time with theoretical questions and am stuck on a
particular problem.

As a simplified model for weather forecasting, suppose that the
weather (either wet or dry) tomorrow will be the same as the weather
today with probability p. If the weather is dry on Jan. 1, show that
Pn, the probability that it will be dry n days later, satisfies:

Pn = (2p - 1)Pn-1 + (1 - p) n >= 1
P0 = 1

Prove that Pn = 1/2 + 1/2(2p - 1)^n  n >= 0
```

```
Date: 05/25/97 at 14:43:20
From: Doctor Anthony
Subject: Re: Probability (Conditional Prob. and Independence)

These problems are best done with probability matrices.  The columns
must add to 1.  Also a probability vector:  |a|
|b|
means a = probability that a day is dry, b = probability that it is
wet.  When you multiply this vector by the matrix shown below, you get
the probabilities for the following day.

FROM

DRY  WET
--------
DRY   |  p   1-p  ||Pn  |     |p*Pn + (1-p)(1-Pn)|
TO         |           ||    |  =  |                  |
WET   | 1-p   p   ||1-Pn|     |(1-p)Pn + p(1-Pn) |

The top entry in the resulting vector is the probability that the
(n+1)th day is dry, i.e. it equals P(n+1)

So P(n+1) = p*Pn + 1 - p - Pn + p*Pn
= (2p-1)Pn + (1-p)

This is the expression we were asked to prove, though I have given the
expression for P(n+1) from Pn, rather than Pn from P(n-1).

If P0 = 1, then P1 = (2p-1)*1 + 1-p  = 2p-1 + 1-p = p
= 1/2 + (1/2)(2p-1)^1

So this fits the pattern for the nth term.  We now assume the
expression is true for n = k and see what happens when we apply the
iterative formula to find P(k+1):

P(k) =  1/2 + 1/2(2p-1)^k    and  P(k+1) = (2p-1)Pk + (1-p)
P(k+1) = (2p-1)[1/2 + 1/2(2p-1)^k] + (1-p)
=  p-1/2 + (1/2)(2p-1)^(k+1) + 1-p
=  1/2 + (1/2)(2p-1)^(k+1)

This is the same expression as before, except that k+1 has replaced k.

Thus if the expression is true for n = k it is also true for n = k+1.
But it is true for n = 1, so it will be true for n = 2, then for n = 3
and so on to all positive integral values of n.  By induction the
expression is true generally.

-Doctor Anthony,  The Math Forum
Check out our web site!  http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
```
Associated Topics:
College Probability

Search the Dr. Math Library:

 Find items containing (put spaces between keywords):   Click only once for faster results: [ Choose "whole words" when searching for a word like age.] all keywords, in any order at least one, that exact phrase parts of words whole words

Submit your own question to Dr. Math
Math Forum Home || Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search