Square Roots using Basic Arithmatic
Date: 03/19/2002 at 19:55:52 From: Tony Starks Subject: Square Roots using basic arithmatic There are three values needed. Two are given: X and Y. Solve for Z. X = Z^Y. Example X = Z^Y, X = 729, Y = 6 729 = Z*Z*Z*Z*Z*Z How can I solve for Z using only addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division?
Date: 03/19/2002 at 22:32:34 From: Doctor Ian Subject: Re: Square Roots using basic arithmatic Hi Tony, The easiest way would be to find the prime factors of 729: 729 = 3 * 243 = 3 * 3 * 81 = 3 * 3 * 9 * 9 = 3 * 3 * 3 * 3 * 3 * 3 Does this help? - Doctor Ian, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
Date: 03/19/2002 at 23:30:22 From: Tony Starks Subject: Square Roots using basic arithmatic Yes, but how would I do that for any value given to X?
Date: 03/20/2002 at 10:00:22 From: Doctor Ian Subject: Re: Square Roots using basic arithmatic Hi Tony, Finding the prime factors of a number is straightforward, although tedious: Prime Factorization http://mathforum.org/dr.math/problems/primefac.html It's possible that if you're given a series of problems, it will be possible to solve them all by using this method. (For example, the point of having you solve the problems might be to give you practice in recognizing and playing with powers of integers.) Sometimes the method may be able to get you to a simpler problem, e.g., X = Z^Y, X = 9604, Y = 4 9604 = Z*Z*Z*Z The prime factors of 9604 are 9604 = 2 * 2 * 7 * 7 * 7 * 7 With a little finagling, we can break them up this way: 9604 = sqrt(2)^4 * 7^4 = (sqrt(2) * 7)^4 which means that X = 7*sqrt(2). Now, if you get a problem like X = Z^Y, X = 214.39, Y = 5 614.39 = Z*Z*Z*Z*Z then you have to treat it as an ordinary root problem, which you answer by guessing. Seriously. You would play with some integers to get close: 2^5 = 32 Too small 3^5 = 243 Too small 4^5 = 1024 Too large So now you know it's somewhere between 3 and 4. Is it 3.5? 3.5^5 = 525.22 Still too small. So now you know it's in the interval (3.5,4.0). And you go from there. This requires nothing more than multiplication to do, but it requires a lot of multiplication, and it is guaranteed to get you as close to the answer as you want. I guess the main thing I'd like to get across to you is that you always want to look for ways to apply tricks like prime factorization first, because when they work, they work quickly: Why study Prime and Composite Numbers? http://mathforum.org/dr.math/problems/howell.01.25.01.html And _only_ when you run out of tricks do you fall back on general methods. Let me give you another example of what I'm talking about. Suppose you're asked to solve two equations: 2x + 3y = 16 2x + 5y = 20 Now, there are several general methods (substitution, elimination, and so on) that you can use to attack this problem, by manipulating the equations in various ways. Or, you could pause to look for a way to _see_ the answer. In this case, we can notice that in going from the first equation to the second, we've added two extra y's on the left, and 4 extra whatevers on the right. Which means that 2y = 4 which makes finding the value of x trivial. It's _only_ when you can't find an easy way to proceed that you resort to the 'usual methods'. Does this help? Write back if you'd like to talk more about this, or anything else. - Doctor Ian, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
Search the Dr. Math Library:
Ask Dr. MathTM
© 1994-2015 The Math Forum