Associated Topics || Dr. Math Home || Search Dr. Math

### Rating Ski Slopes

```
Date: 02/07/99 at 17:52:38
From: Chris Conte
Subject: How to rate the best ski slope in New England

I am doing a science project rating the best ski slope value for kids
on a weekend. I selected 20 slopes - 5 each in Massachusetts, New
Hampshire, Maine, and Vermont - and collected information on each
slope: Jr. Price lift ticket, number of trails, vertical drop, number
of lifts, longest trail, and cost per trail.

I gave a rating to each variable so the lowest price ticket got a 1 and
the next a 2. I did that for each variable, and now have a total score
for each mountain obtained by adding the ranking for each variable for
each mountain. Killington has the best score of 24, and Ward Hill in
Massachusetts the worst with a score of 64 (a perfect score is 6 and
the worst score is 90).

How can I give more weight to one variable over another and come up
with scores that are more accurate and that are based on 100?
```

```
Date: 02/09/99 at 10:19:04
From: Doctor Nick
Subject: Re: How to rate the best ski slope in New England

Hi Chris -

One thing you might do is reverse your scoring system so that the worst
score in each variable gets 1, the second worst gets 2, and so on, so
that the best gets the most points. Then figure the maximum score that
a slope could get, and re-scale it by an appropriate factor. For
instance, if 90 is the best possible score, multiply all the scores by
100/90 and then they'll all be based on 100.

As for giving weight to one variable over another, the easiest thing
to do is to multiply each variable by a weighting factor, say a number
between 0 and 1, with close to zero values for unimportant factors and
values close to 1 for important ones. This changes the maximum possible
score, so you'll have to determine what the maximum score is with your
weighting, and re-scale to get the scores to be based on 100.

For instance, if a slope had rankings of 3, 10, 7, 9, 11, and 2 for the
six variables, and there are 15 slopes, then the scores for this slope
would be 13, 6, 9, 7, 5, 14 for a total score of 54 which on a basis of
100 is 54*(100/90) = 60.

Now suppose you don't want give the first variables as much weight as
the others. You could multiply that one by 1/2 (for example) and the
rest by 1 (so they stay the same). This gives the slope a score of

13/2 + 6 + 9 + 7 + 5 + 14 = 47.5

Now a score of 90 is no longer possible. The best a slope could do is
15/2 + 15 + 15 + 15 + 15 + 15 = 82.5. This slope's scaled score is now
47.5*(100/82.5) = 57.5757, or about 58. Notice that it makes sense that
this slope's score went down, since its first score was one of its
best.

A difficulty you'll have to consider in this is that while weighting
the scores is a good idea, there is no one way to weight them. Perhaps
the number of lifts is important to you, but it might not be to me.
Each person would give a different weight to a different variable. You
should experiment and try a bunch of weightings to see how they affect
the final scores. Is one slope generally the best, even with quite
different weightings? Can you make each slope the best by choosing a
weighting that emphasizes the good aspects of that slope?

This is a very important area of applied mathematics. Have fun with it,
and know that it's not easy. Try a lot of things to get a feel for how
different methods might work. Here's something to consider: what
happens if you multiply the scores, instead of adding?

- Doctor Nick, The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
```
Associated Topics:
High School Statistics

Search the Dr. Math Library:

 Find items containing (put spaces between keywords):   Click only once for faster results: [ Choose "whole words" when searching for a word like age.] all keywords, in any order at least one, that exact phrase parts of words whole words

Submit your own question to Dr. Math
Math Forum Home || Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search