The Math Forum

Ask Dr. Math - Questions and Answers from our Archives
Associated Topics || Dr. Math Home || Search Dr. Math

Central Limit Theorem

Date: 03/08/2002 at 11:04:34
From: Stephanie Sparks
Subject: Probability of "at least"

Here's the problem:

The probability that a drug is effective on any one patient is 62%. 
Find the probability that, of the next 200 patients, at least half 
(or more) will survive.  

I've figured that the probability of the patient dying is 38%, and out 
of the next 200 patients, we want to know if at least 100 or more 
people will survive, exactly 100 or more successes in 200 trials, but 
I don't know what to do from there.  


Date: 03/08/2002 at 17:47:27
From: Doctor Jubal
Subject: Re: Probability of "at least"

Hi Stephanie,

Thanks for writing Dr. Math.

The most straightforward way to do this, and one that would take a lot 
of time, is to recognize that the probability of achieving k successes 
in N trials has a binomial distribution, which is

  P(k) = p^k * (1-p)^(N-k) * ----------

where p is the probability of success on a single trial. You could use 
this to calculate P(100), P(101), P(102), and so on to P(200), and 
then add all these probabilities up, and you'd have the exact answer.  
It would also take you far more time than you probably want to devote 
to this problem.

One of the most useful theorems of statistics is the Central Limit 
Theorem, which says that if you take a large number of independent 
random variables and add them together, no matter what the form of the 
probability distributions of the individual variables is, the sum will 
have a distribution that is approximately Gaussian.

This is nice because it lets us approximate a binomial distribution 
(with a "large enough" value of N) as a Gaussian one, because the 
binomial distriubtion itself is really the sum of several Bernoulli 
distributions (each trial has a Bernoulli distribution), so as the 
number of trials gets large, the binomial distribution becomes more or 
less Gaussian. Because the Gaussian distribution is continuous 
(whereas the binomial distribution is discrete), it lets us do an 
integral instead of the sum P(100) + P(101) + P(102) + ... + P(200).  
Best of all, the values of the integral we need to do have already 
been calculated and put in the back of almost any mathematical 
handbook or statistics text.

The Gaussian distribution that best approximates a binomial 
distribution has mean Np and variance Np(1-p), which makes a lot of 
sense because Np and Np(1-p) are the mean and variance of the binomial 
distribution itself.

So, since 62% of the patients survive, the mean number of survivors in 
200 patients is (0.62)(200) = 124. Also, we can expect a variance in 
this value of (0.62)(0.38)(200) = 47.12, for a standard deviation of 
about 6.86. As you said, we want to know what the probability of at 
least 100 patients surviving is, or rather what the probability of 
doing no worse than 24 more deaths than the mean. 24 is 
(24)/(6.86) = 3.5 times more than the standard deviation.

Now, for a Gaussian distribution, what is the probability of falling 
no more than 3.5 standard deviations below the mean?

Does this help?  Write back if you'd like to talk about this some
more, or if you have any other questions.

- Doctor Jubal, The Math Forum   
Associated Topics:
High School Probability
High School Statistics

Search the Dr. Math Library:

Find items containing (put spaces between keywords):
Click only once for faster results:

[ Choose "whole words" when searching for a word like age.]

all keywords, in any order at least one, that exact phrase
parts of words whole words

Submit your own question to Dr. Math

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

Math Forum Home || Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search

Ask Dr. MathTM
© 1994- The Math Forum at NCTM. All rights reserved.