Associated Topics || Dr. Math Home || Search Dr. Math

### Patterns in Linear Systems

```
Date: 11/12/2001 at 22:04:24
From: Chris
Subject: Patterns in linear systems

In math class, we were asked to see if we could find a pattern in a a
certain type of linear system. We were given the equation 2x+5y=8,
and it was pointed out that the coefficients increase by 3 each time.
So, we were asked to create linear systems that are similar to that,
using equations such as 3x+4y=5, or 4x+6y=8 (any equation where the
difference between consecutive numbers is constant).

I set up systems like this and noticed the solution was always
(-1, 2). I was surprised by this, so I wanted to see if I could find
some way to determine that all systems like this would have that
solution. I let c equal the number in front of the and d represent the
distance between consecutive numbers. I formed the following equation
that, I think, expresses how all of the equations could be:

(c)x + (c + d)y = c + 2d

I then let x = -1 and y = 2, and subsituted it into the left and right
side to see if this made the equations true.

Left side = (c)-1 + (c + d)2
= -c + 2c + 2d
= c + 2d

Right side = c + 2d

Since both sides are equal, than the solution to all systems in this
form must be (-1, 2) because this satisfies all equations in that
form.

My question is, is that adequate proof that linear systems using
equations like the one I described? Would there be an easier way to
explain why the solution of systems with equations like that is
always (-1, 2)? I am in grade 10 and the way I went about explaining
why does not seem like anything that we have done in class, so I am
thinking that there might be a different way to explain it. Did I
make any mistakes in my explanation?

Thank you.
```

```
Date: 11/13/2001 at 16:55:49
From: Doctor Peterson
Subject: Re: Patterns in linear systems

Hi, Chris.

I don't know what you were expected to do, but you did just what I
would do. Good work! Using parameters c and d, and plugging in (-1,2)
to check that what you had discovered is true, is the most
straightforward way I can see to prove it.

Now I'm inclined to pursue this a little further. To start with, I'd
like to see whether I could have discovered this fact algebraically
rather than by experimentation. So I take your equation

cx + (c + d)y = c + 2d

and try rearranging it to see what I find. For example, how about if
we rewrite it as if c and d were the variables and x and y were mere
parameters, by collecting all terms containing each of them together
and factoring them out? Then we get

c(x + y - 1) + d(y - 2) = 0

That's interesting, because it means that if (x+y-1) and (y-2) are
both zero, then this will be true for ALL c and d. That is, the point
(-1,2) is on all lines in this family. There's your fact, dropping
right out of the equation (after some experienced massaging). There's
in that it doesn't LOOK like I had to magically know about (-1,2) in
order to do it.

Now what else can we do with this? We're looking at a parametrized
family of lines, and we've seen that for some reason they all pass
through this one point. What is special about that point? And how does
each parameter affect the lines?

The fact that my rearranged equation has no actual constant term tells
me something about how c and d affect the line; it turns out that the
line is entirely determined by the ratio c/d. You could therefore
reduce the problem to a single parameter by arbitrarily setting d = 1,
which is equivalent to dividing the equation through by d. You might
like to play with that.

Now, what makes (-1,2) special, and is there any way we could make a
similar family that passes through a different point? One thing I see
is that my form of the equation makes it look like you've added
together the lines x+y = 1 and y = 2. That leads to some interesting
thoughts.

I'll leave it to you to see if you can find any more interesting facts

- Doctor Peterson, The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
```
Associated Topics:
High School Analysis
High School Linear Equations

Search the Dr. Math Library:

 Find items containing (put spaces between keywords):   Click only once for faster results: [ Choose "whole words" when searching for a word like age.] all keywords, in any order at least one, that exact phrase parts of words whole words

Submit your own question to Dr. Math
Math Forum Home || Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search