Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum

Ask Dr. Math - Questions and Answers from our Archives
_____________________________________________
Associated Topics || Dr. Math Home || Search Dr. Math
_____________________________________________

Alternating Harmonic Series


Date: 11/18/97 at 14:18:46
From: Phil Campbell
Subject: Alternating harmonic series

I am desperately trying to find the proof for the sum of the 
alternating harmonic series. I did find out that it is ln(2), but 
please tell me why. We discussed it in calculus for two days after I 
brought it up, but couldn't even figure out what it converges to.  
I looked it up and found out, but I need the proof so I can show it to 
other curious parties, and so I can once again sleep at night.  

Thanks.


Date: 11/18/97 at 15:49:01
From: Doctor Pete
Subject: Re: Alternating harmonic series

Hi,

Here is the proof. It requires an understanding of Taylor series.

Theorem:  Sum[(-1)^(n-1)/1, {n,1,Infinity}] = 1 - 1/2 + 1/3 - ... = 
Ln[2].

Proof:  Recall that the Taylor series expansion of a function F[x] 
about a point x = a is

     F[x] = Sum[F^(n)[a]*(x-a)^n/n!,{n,0,Infinity}],

where F^(n)[a] is the n(th) derivative of F[x] with respect to x, 
evaluated at x = a.  When a = 0, we have the Maclaurin expansion

     F[x] = Sum[F^(n)[0]*x^n/n!,{n,0,Infinity}].

Now, let F[x] = Ln[1+x].  Then the successive derivatives with respect 
to x are

        F'[x] = (1+x)^(-1)
       F''[x] = -(1+x)^(-2)
      F'''[x] = 2(1+x)^(-3)
     F^(4)[x] = -6(1+x)^(-4)
         ...
     F^(n)[x] = (-1)^(n-1)(n-1)!(1+x)^(-n), n > 0.

since we see the sign alternating (positive when we take an odd 
derivative, negative when we take the even derivative).  At x = a = 0, 
we find

     F[0] = Ln[1+0] = 0,
     F^(n)[0] = (-1)^(n-1)(n-1)!, n > 0.

Therefore, the n(th) term in the Maclaurin series expansion of Ln[1+x] 
is

     F[0]*x^0/0! = 0*1 = 0,
     F^(n)[0]*x^n/n! = (-1)^(n-1)*x^n/n, n > 0.

since (n-1)!/n! = 1/n.  So it follows that

     Ln[1+x] = Sum[(-1)^(n-1)*x^n/n,{n,1,Infinity}]

(note the index begins on 1, not 0, because the term where n = 0 is 
0).  But if we let x = 1 in the above, we obtain

     Ln[2] = Sum[(-1)^(n-1)/n,{n,1,Infinity}],

which is what was to be proved.
________

Note that the interval of convergence of the Maclaurin series for 
Ln[1+x] is -1 < x <= 1; that is, any value outisde of this range 
will not be a valid convergent series. To see why, we apply the 
ratio test and obtain |x| < 1; but as you have proved, the alternating 
harmonic series, where x = 1, does converge. Therefore the interval 
includes this endpoint. Obviously, when x = -1, Ln[1+x] = Ln[0] 
and is not defined, but observe that the term in the series is then 
(-1)^(n-1)*(-1)^n/n = -1/n; hence Sum[1/n,{n,1,Infinity}] = -Ln[0], 
which does not converge! (Of course, you can't really say this - it 
is because the harmonic series fails to converge that the Maclaurin 
series fails to be valid at that point, not the other way around.)  
Finally, we can prove lots of other interesting sums with this series, 
for instance

  1/2 - 1/8 + 1/24 - 1/64 + ... = Ln[1+1/2] = Ln[3/2] = Ln[3] - Ln[2].

-Doctor Pete,  The Math Forum
 Check out our web site!  http://mathforum.org/dr.math/   


Date: 11/18/97 at 15:52:24
From: Doctor Wilkinson
Subject: Re: Alternating harmonic series

ln(2) is the integral from 1 to 2 of dx/x.  Make the substitition 
x = 1 + t to transform this to the integral from 0 to 1 of dt/(1+t).  
Expand 1/(1+t) into the geometric series 1 - t + t^2 - t^3 +-... and 
integrate term-by-term.  (Of course you have to justify the term-by-
term integration.)

-Doctor Wilkinson,  The Math Forum
 Check out our web site!  http://mathforum.org/dr.math/   
    
Associated Topics:
High School Analysis
High School Calculus
High School Sequences, Series

Search the Dr. Math Library:


Find items containing (put spaces between keywords):
 
Click only once for faster results:

[ Choose "whole words" when searching for a word like age.]

all keywords, in any order at least one, that exact phrase
parts of words whole words

Submit your own question to Dr. Math

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

_____________________________________
Math Forum Home || Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search
_____________________________________

Ask Dr. MathTM
© 1994-2013 The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/