Why Can't Some Functions be Integrated?Date: 11/06/96 at 15:49:26 From: Deepak Shenoy Subject: Calculus - Integration Why can't some functions be integrated? For example, I have been trying to evaluate Integral[x tanx dx] (without limits) and have not been able to do it. I tried the regular uv rule where you integrate the trigonometric function first. I have been told that this integral can be found only by integrating within limits or by expanding the function into a polynomial. Please advise. Date: 11/07/96 at 08:22:27 From: Doctor Jerry Subject: Re: Calculus - Integration Why can't some functions be integrated? For the same reason that an arbitrary angle can't be trisected or there is no general formula for finding the roots of a fifth degree polynomial. There is a proof that not all functions can be integrated, just as there is a proof that not all angles can be trisected (with straightedge and compass), and a proof that there is no formula for finding the roots of a fifth degree polynomial. Of these proofs, the first and third are difficult, requiring courses beyond those commonly given in the first four years of undergraduate mathematics (in the U.S.A.). There is a procedure due to a contemporary mathematician named Risch which allows you to determine whether the anti-derivative of a continuous function f can be expressed as a finite combination of elementary functions. The elementary functions include polynomials, the trig functions, the inverse trig functions, the exponential function and its inverse, etc. The computer algebra system Mathematica expresses the anti-derivative of x*tan(x) in terms of the polylogarithm function, which is not an elementary function. This is not a proof that an anti-derivative of x*tan(x) can't be expressed as a finite combination of elementary functions, but a clue that this might well be the case. Integration by parts was a reasonable thing to try, but as you found, it doesn't seem to work out. The other standard techniques also fail. You say that x*tan(x) can be integrated within limits. If you mean by this that the integral can be done numerically, by using Simpson's Rule, for example, I agree. Whether there are limits or not doesn't change the fact that no elementary anti-derivative is known for this function. Numerical integration is thus needed. The other alternative you mentioned is to expand x*tan(x) into a power series and integrate term-by-term. This gives an infinite series for the anti-derivative. This is a useful but roundabout way of solving the problem, not an expression of the anti-derivative in terms of a finite combination of elementary functions. -Doctor Jerry, The Math Forum Check out our web site! http://mathforum.org/dr.math/ Date: 11/07/96 at 18:26:37 From: Doctor Anthony Subject: Re: Calculus - Integration This is a messy integral. For |x|< pi/2, here is your power series approximation: INT[x.tan(x).dx] = x^3/3 + x^5/15 + (2/105)x^7 + (17/2835)x^9 + ... -Doctor Anthony, The Math Forum Check out our web site! http://mathforum.org/dr.math/ |
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]
Ask Dr. Math^{TM}
© 1994- The Math Forum at NCTM. All rights reserved.
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/