Associated Topics || Dr. Math Home || Search Dr. Math

### Points of Intersection

```
Date: 08/31/97 at 17:01:35
From: Lisa Wang
Subject: Points of Intersection

Dear Dr. Math:

I'm a high school student taking calculus.  I encountered this

The problem is:

Estimate all points of intersection of the graphs f(x) = x + sin x and
g(x) = x^3 by using a calculator or computer. How do you know you have
found them all?

I estimated the points of intersection by using a graphing calculator
to be (-1.317, -2.285), (0,0), and (1.317,2.285). But I got stuck on
the second question.  I thought about it and came up with a partial
explanation.  But I somehow think it's not reasonable.

f(x) = x + sin x

1. f'(x) = 1 + cos x: This means that at any point (x, y), the
slope = 1 + cox x. We can think of the slope as the rate f(x)
is changing.

g(x) = x^3

1. g'(x) = 3x^2: This means that any point (x, y) has a slope
of 3x^2. This also indicates that g(x) is changing at a rate
of 3x^2.

When you compare the derivatives (or slopes) of the two functions
(curves), you see that g(x) is always changing at a greater rate
than f(x).  The slope of f(x) is always between 1 and 2 (since it's
1 + cos x); while the slope of g(x) increases to infinity.

Does points of intersection have anything to do with the derivative
(or the slope of th curves)?  Or are they related to acceleration (the
second derivative)?  I'm confused and I don't know if I'm going in the
right direction.
```

```
Date: 08/31/97 at 19:51:44
From: Doctor Anthony
Subject: Re: Points of Intersection

The three solutions you give are correct, but your reasoning on the
slopes of the two curves is not correct.

f'(x) = 1 + cos(x)   and since cos(x) varies between -1 and +1 the
slope of f(x) varies between  0 and 2.

g'(x) = 3x^2   This is less than the slope of f(x) when x is near
0 and accounts for the fact that other intersections
occur in addition to the (0,0) point.

When x > 1.31716 the gradient of f(x) has a maximum value of 2 while
gradient of g(x) is greater than 5.2047.  It follows that no further
intersections are possible.

-Doctor Anthony,  The Math Forum
Check out our web site!  http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
```

```
Date: 08/31/97 at 21:14:50
From: Lisa Wang
Subject: Re: Points of Intersection

Dear Dr. Math:

Now I don't understand why you are looking at maximum value of the
slope of f(x) when  x > 1.31716 (which is 2) and the slope of g(x) to
determine any other points of intersection.  Don't you have to plug
x > 1.31716 into f(x) and g(x) rather than f'(x) and g'(x)?

Also, I know that g'(x) is less than f'(x) when x is near 0.  But I
don't see how the different slopes determine points of intersection
near 0.

The values that I got for f'(x) at (0,0) and g'(x) at (0,0) are
different.  So I think I can draw the conclusion that the slopes of
f(x) and g(x) at their intersection points are not equal.  I don't
quite understand how the slopes of functions affect their points of
intersection.
```

```
Date: 09/01/97 at 06:11:30
From: Doctor Anthony
Subject: Re: Points of Intersection

Look at the point of intersection where x = 1.31716. The y values of
the two functions are equal at this point (since the curves cut here).
We know that the slope of one of the curves (g(x)) is thereafter (as
x increases) always greater than the slope of the other curve (f(x)),
so there is no way that any more intersections can take place.  We
can conclude there will be no further intersections with x > 1.31716

At the point (0,0) the slope of g(x) is zero and the slope of f(x)
is 2, so f(x) rises above g(x). However as x increases the slopes
change rapidly, with g(x) increasing and f(x) decreasing, and this
change leads to the curves crossing again at x = 1.31716  Thereafter
the slopes determine that no further crossing points are possible, as
described above.

-Doctor Anthony,  The Math Forum
Check out our web site!  http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
```

```
Date: 09/02/97 at 00:30:38
From: Lisa Wang
Subject: Re: Points of Intersection

Dear Dr. Math:

I still don't quite understand the effect of slope on intersection
points.

My questions are:

1. At the points of intersection (0, 0), (1.31716, 2.28517), and
(-1.31716, -2.285179), the slopes of f(x) and g(x) are not equal.
How does slope determine points of intersection?  In other words,
when two functions intersect, what must their slopes be? (equal?
greater? smaller?)

2. You said that "the slope of one of the curves (g(x)) is thereafter
(as x increases) always greater than the slope of the other curve
(f(x)), so there is no way that any more intersections can take place
when x > 1.31716."  I understand this. However, at the point of
intersection (1.31716, 2.28517), the slope of g(x) is already greater
than the slope of f(x). Why do you say that if the slope of g(x) is
greater than the slope of f(x), then no intersection is possible?
(since the two curves intersected when x = 1.31716 and at that point
the slope of g(x) is greater than the slope of f(x))
```

```
Date: 09/02/97 at 05:37:11
From: Doctor Anthony
Subject: Re: Points of Intersection

At the point of intersection the slopes will in general be different,
unless the curves are tangential to each other.  It is what happens
AFTER the point of intersection that interests us.  If the curves
diverge then NO FURTHER points of intersection can occur.

>Why do you say that if the slope of g(x) is greater than the slope of
>f(x), then no intersection is possible? (since the two curves
>intersected when x = 1.31716 and at that point the slope of g(x) is
>greater than the slope of f(x))

I think we have run into a language problem here.  We had accepted
that the curves intersected in three points (0,0) and  (-1.31716,
-2.28517), (1.31716, 2.28517). The question asked us to show that
there were no FURTHER points of intersection.  It is in pursuit of
establishing this fact that I have been talking about the slopes of
the two curves. Obviously at the three points of intersection already
established we are not concerned about the slopes, except in so far as
the slopes determine whether FURTHER points of intersection are
possible.

At the point (1.31716, 2.28517) the two curves intersect, but now as
x increases one curve slopes up at a rate that is always greater than
the other curve.  Because of this the two curves can not cross each
other AGAIN.

-Doctor Anthony,  The Math Forum
Check out our web site!  http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
```
Associated Topics:
High School Calculus

Search the Dr. Math Library:

 Find items containing (put spaces between keywords):   Click only once for faster results: [ Choose "whole words" when searching for a word like age.] all keywords, in any order at least one, that exact phrase parts of words whole words

Submit your own question to Dr. Math
Math Forum Home || Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search