Associated Topics || Dr. Math Home || Search Dr. Math

### Calculus: Limits

```
Date: 11/24/97 at 07:52:20
From: Susan Batchilder
Subject: Calculus: limits

In my textbook, the limit of (1/x) as x approaches zero is defined as
infinity. But the limit as you approach zero from the negative side is
negative infinity and the limit as you approach zero from the positive
side is positive infinity. Therefore since the limit from the right
does not equal the limit from the left, then by definition limit should
not exist.

So, why does my textbook have the limit defined as infinity?

I look forward to having the mystery solved.

Thank you,
Susan
```

```
Date: 11/24/97 at 12:32:16
From: Doctor Rob
Subject: Re: Calculus:  limits

Dear Susan,

Your reasoning showing that the limit does not exist is correct.
Because the limit does not exist, saying that it "equals infinity" is,
on the face of it, nonsensical.

This function behaves in a special way that makes the limit not exist.
The way it behaves is that as x gets small in absolute value, the
function gets large in absolute value.  Stated more technically, given
any number N > 0, we can find a d > 0 such that whenever |x| < d, then
|1/x| > N.

The value of d happens to be 1/N for this particular function, but
would be different for other functions.

This means that as x gets small in absolute value, the function grows
without bound in absolute value.  The function is said to have a
vertical asymptote at x = 0, and the common phrase that the limit
"equals infinity" is actually a shorthand for this situation.  So this
is why your textbook might have said that the limit was infinity.

But why is this phrase chosen?  It has to do with convenience.
Mathematicians like the fact that limits, when they exist, commute
with all the operations of arithmetic.  We want this property to hold
true for all limits, and when we try to extend it to include limits of
functions like 1/x as x -> 0, we end up with exactly the same
structure as when we try to append "infinity" to the usual real
numbers, and the same difficulties.

Examples of these difficulties are infinity minus infinity not being
definable, infinity over infinity not being definable, and infinity
times zero not being  definable.

Even though working with infinity as a number gives rise to all of the
difficulties above, it is still easier than working with something
that's "undefined."

There are other ways that limits might not exist, but do not "equal
infinity," or have their absolute values get arbitrarily large.  One
example is the function f(x) defined by:

f(x) = -1 if x < 0
f(x) = 0 if x = 0
f(x) = +1 if x > 0.

f(x) is a function whose limit as x approaches zero does not exist,
because there is a jump at 0.  A more difficult example is the
function:

sin(1/x) as x -> 0

for which the limit also doesn't exist, due to ever-increasingly rapid
oscillation.  In neither of these situations do we use the phrase that
the limit "equals infinity."

I hope this makes sense.  If not, write again.

-Doctor Rob,  The Math Forum
Check out our web site!  http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
```
Associated Topics:
High School Calculus

Search the Dr. Math Library:

 Find items containing (put spaces between keywords):   Click only once for faster results: [ Choose "whole words" when searching for a word like age.] all keywords, in any order at least one, that exact phrase parts of words whole words

Submit your own question to Dr. Math
Math Forum Home || Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search