Are Exponents Associative?Date: 02/05/2002 at 07:43:41 From: Lucas Subject: Complex numbers I have a question that I couldn't answer: How much is 2^(i) or X^(i) ? I asked my teacher, and he said that 2^(i) = 2^(-1)^(0.5) = 0.5^0.5~0,707106781186547524400844362104849 I think a formula exists to find y and z: 2^(i) = y and y^(i) = 0.5 2^(-i) = z and y^(-i) = 0.5 2^(-i) = z and y^(i) = 2 Is this correct? If not, why not? Thanks. Date: 02/05/2002 at 11:37:37 From: Doctor Peterson Subject: Re: Complex numbers Hi, Lucas. It looks as if your teacher accidentally assumed that exponents are associative, that is, that (a^b)^c = a^(b^c) We are used to this being true for addition and multiplication, but it is NOT TRUE of exponents; for that reason, it is important to include parentheses to clarify this, though by convention we take a^b^c to mean a^(b^c). Note that, in reality, (a^b)^c = a^(b*c) (Your own facts are correct, if I fix one typo, and they make use of this fact. Unfortunately, I don't see that they go anywhere useful.) Here is what your teacher claimed, with the wrong move stated explicitly: 2^i = 2^[(-1)^0.5] = [2^-1]^0.5 = 0.5^0.5 = 0.707 NO! To solve this correctly, you need to use Euler's formula, which you can read about in the Dr. Math FAQ: Imaginary Exponents and Euler's Equation http://mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/faq.euler.equation.html This says that e^(xi) = cos(x) + sin(x) i We can transform your power of 2 to a power of e this way: 2^i = (e^ln(2))^i = e^(ln(2) i) Now apply Euler to this: = cos(ln(2)) + sin(ln(2)) i = 0.769 + 0.639 i I know that sounds weird, but this definition of imaginary powers makes all the rules for exponents work, so it is what we use. You can find more about this in our archives. - Doctor Peterson, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/ |
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]
Ask Dr. Math^{TM}
© 1994-2015 The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/