RadiansDate: 03/22/2001 at 19:12:41 From: Maddie Subject: Trigonometry - Radians Dr. Math - I have searched everywhere for the history behind radians. Why is it that they replaced degrees? Is there a history behind this? I thought it was because of the ability to have zero degrees in a circle, but I don't think this is the reason. Date: 03/22/2001 at 22:56:45 From: Doctor Peterson Subject: Re: Trigonometry - Radians Hi, Maddie. I wouldn't exactly say that radians replaced degrees - degrees are still very much in use. Each has its place: degrees work well for naming common angles with whole numbers (30, 45, 60, 90, rather than pi/6, etc.), while radians work well in calculus. You can find several explanations of the latter by searching our archives for the words radians degrees . Here's one: Why Radians? http://mathforum.org/dr.math/problems/munroe12.3.97.html The basic idea is that radians measure the arc length of an angle, which for small angles is close to the sine. That means that if you measure angles in radians, the slope of the graph of the sine is 1 at the origin. When you get to calculus, you find that the derivative of the sine is the cosine - it wouldn't be nearly as simple using degrees. And you can write infinite series and other formulas that give the value of the sine, which are much simpler using radians. Radians simply turn out to be the "obvious" unit to use for angles, once you've had plenty of experience with them. - Doctor Peterson, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/ |
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]
Ask Dr. Math^{TM}
© 1994-2015 The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/