Defining Transcendental FunctionsDate: 02/05/2001 at 21:10:33 From: Ruth Subject: Defining transcendental functions I am looking for a precise definition of a transcendental function and of an elementary function. I BELIEVE that the set of elementary functions is just the set of algebraic functions and the set of transcendental functions combined, but I cannot find it specifically defined anywhere in my calculus book or at any of the Web sites I have visited. (Most sites with mathematics definitions do not include elementary functions.) My book (James Stewart's Calculus, 4th edition) defines transcendental functions as everything except algebraic functions (functions containing only addition, subtraction, division, multiplication, powers, and roots), then gives a few examples (trig and inverse trig functions, log and exponential functions, and hyperbolic and inverse hyperbolic functions), and then says, "it also includes a vast number of functions that have never been named...we will study transcendental functions that are defined as sums of infinite series." Are all infinite series transcendental functions? Later, when defining elementary functions, it lists examples and then says that the integral of an elementary function is usually not an elementary function. Can you define a non-elementary function by some other means than as the integral of another function? Can the unnamed transcendental functions that the book mentions be expressed symbolically, or would that be considered naming them? How am I to distinguish between an unnamed transcendental function and a non- elementary function? I am would LOVE a clear answer on this. Thank you, Ruth Costa Date: 02/08/2001 at 23:30:46 From: Doctor Fenton Subject: Re: Defining transcendental functions Hi Ruth, Thanks for writing to Dr. Math. You've asked some very good questions. The definition of elementary functions seems to be a matter of consensus within the mathematical community, and it basically consists of the "familiar" functions, and functions that can be generated from the standard ones by addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, and composition. Like most definitions, this is somewhat arbitrary, but I think there is pretty general agreement on which functions are "elementary." The definition of an algebraic function is also fairly precise, as you described (I might add that the powers and roots must be rational ones). A problem with "transcendental" is that it is a catch-all definition, defined by exclusion rather than by direct characterization. Anything that is not an algebraic function is, by definition, transcendental. In that regard, it's somewhat like irrational numbers, which are defined by exclusion: they aren't rational. That makes it difficult to make general statements about them. For example, we can say that the sum and product of rational numbers is rational, but sqrt(2) and (2-sqrt(2)) show that the sum of irrationals can be rational, and sqrt(2)*sqrt(2) shows that the product of irrationals can be rational. There is only a countably infinite number of algebraic functions, but it can be shown that there are uncountably many continuous functions on an interval, for example. Since there are only countably many finite strings of mathematical symbols, it isn't possible to describe "most" functions. These are some of the "unnamed transcendental functions" Professor Stewart is trying to describe. He can only give you a hint of the complexity of the set of transcendental functions. There are also "named" transcendental functions: Bessel functions and Hankel functions, to name a couple. These arise in certain specialized areas, and are well-known to experts in those fields, but the typical math student may never encounter them, so they are not put in the "elementary" list. So basically, there is just no way to describe a "typical" transcendental function. Many of them are indeed generated by infinite series, but on the other hand, some infinite series describe algebraic and elementary functions, too. Elementary and algebraic functions are relatively small, precisely defined collections of functions, which can be characterized by common properties. Transcendental functions share only the property of being non- algebraic. I'm sorry I can't be of more help, but there just isn't any way to characterize transcendental or non-elementary functions in general, other than that single exclusionary property. If you have further questions, please write us again. - Doctor Fenton, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/ |
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]
Ask Dr. Math^{TM}
© 1994- The Math Forum at NCTM. All rights reserved.
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/