SSA Theorem: Valid or Invalid?Date: 12/19/2001 at 20:48:14 From: Chip Collins Subject: An earlier answer You said that the SSA Theorem cannot be used to prove congruence. My teacher said you CAN use it. Please help straighten this problem out. Date: 12/19/2001 at 22:57:37 From: Doctor Peterson Subject: Re: An earlier answer Hi, Chip. The problem is that what most people would expect an SSA theorem to say (that if two sides and a non-included angle in one triangle are congruent to the corresponding parts of another triangle, then the triangles are congruent) is false. Our archives, which you have apparently seen, give counterexamples to show that these conditions can be true for non-congruent triangles. Here are two: Angle-Side-Side Does Not Work http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/54663.html SSA and Non-congruent Triangles http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/55036.html But some of our discussions of this issue suggest ways to "salvage" the SSA idea and make a theorem out of it by adding extra conditions: AAA, ASS, SSA Theorems http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/54659.html SSA Proof http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/55278.html The last of these states a valid SSA theorem explicitly, and also points out that the Hypotenuse-Leg theorem is a special case of this. If your text has stated and proved such a modified SSA theorem, or if you have done so yourself, then you can use that theorem. But if all you have is a naive version that has not been proved, then it is not a theorem and you can't use it. - Doctor Peterson, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/ |
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]
Ask Dr. Math^{TM}
© 1994-2015 The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/