Associated Topics || Dr. Math Home || Search Dr. Math

### Product of Isometries

```
Date: 10/05/97 at 13:00:04
From: Marie D.
Subject: Product of translation and rotation

Greetings!

I am currently enrolled in an enriched Euclidean geometry class. In a
recent assignment, I was asked to use three isometries (translation,
rotation, and reflection) in composition with each other and deduce
the net result of the two transformations. For example, I worked out
that the product of a reflection followed by a reflection through a
line parallel to the first line results in a net translation.
However, if the lines  intersect, the net result is a rotation.

The major problem occurs when I consider a translation followed by a
rotation. My teacher claims that there is a fixed point around which
the image may be rotated to obtain the net result. I'm having
difficulty convincing myself of this, as I can't find a point which
results in the same image. Any help would be appreciated, including
referral to other sources of information on the Web, etc.

Thanks!

Marie
```

```
Date: 10/06/97 at 20:00:15
From: Doctor Tom
Subject: Re: Product of translation and rotation

Hi Marie,

Here's how I think about it. It's hard to draw a picture using only
typing, so I suggest you draw a picture as you try to follow what
I'm saying.

The rotation occurs about some point, right? Call that point P. The
translation moved some point that was previously at Q to that point P.
On your paper, make two points and label them Q and P.

Draw an arrow from Q to P to represent the translation. Every other
point in the plane moved parallel to that arrow and by exactly the
same amount.

Now draw a circle around P that has a larger diameter than the arrow
from Q to P. If you imagine sliding that arrow parallel to itself
until it touches the circle at two points, then if the rotation is
opposite the direction of the arrow and by an angle such that the
arrow touches the circle at two points that are exactly that angle
apart, you will have found a point that is moved back to itself.
The translation takes it along the arrow that you moved to touch the
circle in 2 places, and then the rotation undoes it.

If the rotation is in the opposite direction, slide the arrow to the
opposite side of the circle and you'll get the same result.

But of course this won't work if the angle is wrong.

But the size of the circle can be anything. What you need to do is
pick a radius for that circle that is exactly large enough that the
length of the arrow connecting 2 points on the circumference of the
circle describes a sector of the circle that has exactly the angle of
rotation.

I've been a little sloppy here, but you can calculate the size of the
circle exactly, and from there determine exactly which point is fixed.

I hope this is enough of a hint to get you going!

When you learn either some linear algebra or topology, this problem
will seem trivial. When I saw the problem, I instantly found 2 proofs
- one involving "eigenvalues" of the transformation matrix, and one
invoking Brower's fixed-point theorem on a mapping of projective
5 minutes of work for me to convert those "instant" proofs into
something that was purely geometric.

Tell your teacher it's a good problem.

-Doctor Tom,  The Math Forum
Check out our web site!  http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
```
Associated Topics:
High School Geometry
High School Symmetry/Tessellations

Search the Dr. Math Library:

 Find items containing (put spaces between keywords):   Click only once for faster results: [ Choose "whole words" when searching for a word like age.] all keywords, in any order at least one, that exact phrase parts of words whole words

Submit your own question to Dr. Math
Math Forum Home || Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search