Proof of the Feuerbach TheoremDate: 03/14/2000 at 13:52:26 From: Stefa Ben Ari Subject: Feuerbach theorem Please submit the proof of the Feuerbach theorem (the nine point circle is tangent to the incircle and the circumcircle of a triangle.) Thank you in advance, Stefa Date: 03/15/2000 at 13:12:57 From: Doctor Floor Subject: Re: Feuerbach theorem Hi Stefa, Thanks for your question. Before we start, let me say that we will make use of a formula on the distance between the circumcenter O and incenter I of a triangle. When we denote by r the radius of the incircle and by R the radius of a circumcircle of a triangle, then we have: IO^2 = R(R-2r) A proof of this formula is given in the Dr. Math archives: http://mathforum.org/dr.math/problems/gural.03.26.99.html I will show you how the tangency of the incircle and the nine-point circle can be proven with the use of complex numbers. To do that, we consider a triangle with vertices A1, A2 and A3, which we represent by complex numbers z1, z2 and z3, respectively. We can do this in such a way that z1, z2 and z3 are positioned counterclockwise on the unit circle with center 0, so R = |z1| = |z2| = |z3| = 1, and the circumcenter O = 0. For the measures of the angles of triangle A1A2A3 at A1, A2 and A3 we will write a1, a2 and a3, respectively. The centroid G of triangle A1A2A3 is G = (z1+z2+z3)/3. Now let us consider the orthocenter H. From the fact that OG:GH = 1:2 we see that H = z1+z2+z3. And since the nine-point center N is halfway between O and H, we see that N = (z1+z2+z3)/2. We can choose t1, t2 and t3 with z1 = e^(t1i) z2 = e^(t2i) z3 = e^(t3i) and v1 = e^(i*t1/2) v2 = e^(i*t2/2) v3 = e^(i*t3/2) in such a way that Q1 = v2v3 bisects the arc A2A3 including A1, Q2 = v1v3 bisects the arc A1A3 including A2 and Q3 = v1v2 bisects arc A1A2 including A3. (Note that v1, v2 and v3 are numbers on the unit circle, and that z1 = v1^2, z2 = v2^2 and z3 = v3^2). The points P1 = -v2v3, P2 = -v1v3 and P3 = -v1v2 are the points opposite to Q1, Q2 and Q3, and are the points where the internal angle bisectors of triangle A1A2A3 meet the circumcircle/unit circle. We can see that the incenter I of A1A2A3 is the orthocenter of P1P2P3 in the following way: Let X be the intersection of A1P1 and P2P3. Note that A1P1 passes through I. Angle A1P1P2 (denoted by <A1P1P2) equals <A1A2P2 = a2/2 Also <P3P2P1 = <P3P2A2 + <A2P2P1 = <P3A3A2 + <A2A1P1 = a3/2 + a1/2 This means that <P1XP2 = 180 degrees - <A1P1P2 - <P3P2P1 = 180 degrees - (a1+a2+a3)/2 = 90 degrees So IP1 is an altitude in P1P2P3, and by symmetry so are IP2 and IP3, which proves that I is the orthocenter of P1P2P3. By this, in the same way that we found H = z1+z2+z3, we see I = -(v1v2+v1v3+v2v3) = -v1v2v3(1/v1 + 1/v2 + 1/v3) = -v1v2v3(v1*+v2*+v3*) = -v1v2v3(v1+v2+v3)* where I write z* for the complex conjugate of z. So, for points z on the unit circle, we know that zz* = 1. We find that IO = |O-I| = |-I| = |v1v2v3(v1+v2+v3)*| = |v1||v2||v3||(v1+v2+v3)*| = 1*1*1*|v1+v2+v3| = |v1+v2+v3| and IN = |N-I| = |(z1+z2+z3)/2 - -(v1v2+v1v3+v2v3)| = |(v1^2+v2^2+v3^2)/2 + (v1v2+v1v3+v2v3)| = |0.5(v1+v2+v3)^2| = 0.5*|v1+v2+v3|^2. We recall the formula IO^2 = R(R-2r), which implies, together with R = 1, that r = 0.5 - 0.5*IO^2. We derive from this: r = 0.5 - 0.5*IO^2 = 0.5 - 0.5*|v1+v2+v3|^2 = 0.5 - IN Now we see that IN = 0.5 - r, and since the radius of the nine-point circle is half the radius of the circumcircle, and thus 0.5, we see that the incircle is (internally) tangent to the nine point circle. The result for the excircles can be found in a similar way. Let's say we consider the A1-excircle, having radius r1 and center I1. Now we have to use the formula I1O^2 = R(R+2r1), and we find I1 as the orthocenter of triangle P1Q2Q3. I leave it to you to follow the computations as above. If you have more questions, just write back. Best regards, - Doctor Floor, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/ Date: 03/26/2000 at 14:11:36 From: Michael Ben Ari Subject: Re: Feuerbach theorem Dear Doctor Floor, Thank you for the proof of the Feuerbach theorem received on 03/14/2000 (Einstein's Birthday and also PI (3.14) ! There is something I didn't understand in the proof: I your proof: > v1 = e^(i*t1/2) > v2 = e^(i*t2/2) > v3 = e^(i*t3/2) > >in such a way that Q1 = v2v3 bisects the arc A2A3 including A1, >Q2 = v1v3 bisects the arc A1A3 including A2 and Q3 = v1v2 bisects arc >A1A2 including A3. I understand that the coordinates of the point Q1 that bisects the arc A2A1A3 are [-cos(t2/2+t3/2),-sin(t2/2+t3/2)] it means Q1 = -v2v3, and the coordinates of the point Q2 that bisects the arc A1A2A3 are [cos(t1/2+t3/2),sin(t1/2+t3/2)] it means Q2 = v1v3 and the coordinates of the point Q3 that bisects the arc A1A3A2 are [-cos(t1/2+t2/2),-sin(t1 /2 +t2 /2)] it means Q3 = -v1v2 and it doesn't fit your statement. I can not find my mistake. Maybe I misunderstood the notation e^(i*t1/2). I understand it as "cos(t1/2) + i sin(t1/2)." Please give this part of the proof in more detail. The remainder of the proof is clear to me. Thank you, Stefa Ben Ari Date: 03/27/2000 at 06:38:09 From: Doctor Floor Subject: Re: Feuerbach theorem Dear Michael, Thanks for your response. It seems that you have overlooked the fact that t1, t2, and t3 can be chosen in two ways. Suppose that z1 = e^(i*t1), and also z1 = e^(i*(t1+2*pi)). These give v1 = e^(i*t1/2) and v1' = e^(i*t1/2 + pi) = -v1. The part of the proof you are quoting is saying that you can choose these t1, t2, and t3 in such a way that the resulting v1, v2, and v3, and consequently Q1, Q2, and Q3, are as desired. It is stated this way to be sure that the right square root of z1 is chosen (there are always two square roots of course.) I hope this clears it up! If you have more questions, just write back. Best regards, - Doctor Floor, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/ |
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]
Ask Dr. Math^{TM}
© 1994-2015 The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/