Volume of a Frustum-Like StructureDate: 05/12/2000 at 13:13:25 From: Alison Cunningham Subject: Volume of a Frustum I have a pyramid-like structure with a rectangular base and rectangular top, i.e. the top of a rectangular pyramid has been removed. I have tried using three different methods to calculate the volume. I was told it's called a frustum. Which one do you suggest? Top: 73 by 37 Bottom: 46 by 10.5 Angle: 18 degrees Height: 4.6 Date: 05/12/2000 at 20:56:28 From: Doctor Peterson Subject: Re: Volume of a Frustum Hi, Alison. I don't know what three methods you have, but our Formula FAQ has a formula: http://mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/formulas/faq.pyramid.html (scroll down to Frustum of a Pyramid): V = h(B1+B2+sqrt[B1*B2])/3 Unfortunately, your shape is not really a frustum of a pyramid, because the top and bottom are not similar, so if you continued the edges up to the point of the presumed pyramid, they would not meet. So that formula does not work. I used calculus, though it probably wasn't entirely necessary, to find a formula for this sort of shape where two rectangles are joined by straight edges, without having to be a frustum, and I got this: a2 +-------+ b2/ / \--------- +-------+ \ | / | \ | /.........|.... + | h / | / | / | / | / | /b1 ------ / | / / |/ +---------------+ a1 V = [a1*b1 + a2*b2 + (a1*b2 + a2*b1)/2] * h/3 Here the bottom is a1 x b1, and the top is a2 x b2, with the a's parallel and the b's parallel. Notice that a1*b1 = B1 and a2*b2 = B2 in the frustum formula; but the third term "averages" the two in a different way, which works out to be the same if a1/b1 = a2/b2. Try both formulas for your shape, and you'll find they give different results. If you are supposed to be able to figure this out for yourself, I'll try to see how you could do it; otherwise, just use this formula, which I don't recall ever seeing. - Doctor Peterson, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/ |
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]
Ask Dr. Math^{TM}
© 1994-2015 The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/