Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum

Ask Dr. Math - Questions and Answers from our Archives
Associated Topics || Dr. Math Home || Search Dr. Math

Pattern in Period

Date: 01/31/99 at 23:04:50
From: Michael Lau
Subject: Pattern in Period

I tried to find some periods with 1 as numerator. I found that if the 
period is even, the first half of the period added to the second half 
equals a series of 9's. Is there any pattern in odd periods too?

e.g.: 1/11 = 0.09090909...  0 + 9 = 9
       1/7 = 0.142857142857...  142 + 857 = 999 

Date: 02/02/99 at 08:50:06
From: Doctor Peterson
Subject: Re: Pattern in Period

I played with your pattern for a while to see if I could prove it to 
be true. I found that it definitely isn't true for all denominators; 
for 1/21, the sum of the two halves of the period is 666. But maybe 
it's true for prime denominators, and also for some composites 
including 14, 22, and 26.

One thing I found is that if 1/a has period 2n, and the sum of the two 
halves of the period (call them x and y) is 10^n - 1, then the 

     1    10^n x + y
    --- = -----------     and    x + y = 10^n - 1
     a    10^(2n) - 1

can be simplified to give

    a(x + 1) = 10^n + 1

so that a must be a divisor of 10^n + 1. (My equations assume the 
period starts at the decimal point, restricting the problem somewhat.) 
This is true, for instance, for small primes such as 7, 11, and 13, 
since 1001 = 7*11*13 and for 17 (100000001 = 17*5882353) and 19 
(1000000001 = 7*11*13*19*52579). I don't know enough number theory to 
see easily that this is true for all primes.

But a little search found Eric Weisstein's page on Midy's theorem, ("If 
the period of a repeating decimal for a/p has an even number of 
digits, the sum of the two halves is a string of 9's, where p is prime 
and a/p is a reduced fraction.") 


This is your pattern, restricted to prime denominators, but extended 
for any numerator except a multiple of the denominators. There is no 
mention of any extension to odd periods.

A further search showed only that Martin Gardner discussed this theorem 
in his book _Mathematical Circus_, which you might be able to find.

- Doctor Peterson, The Math Forum
Associated Topics:
High School Number Theory

Search the Dr. Math Library:

Find items containing (put spaces between keywords):
Click only once for faster results:

[ Choose "whole words" when searching for a word like age.]

all keywords, in any order at least one, that exact phrase
parts of words whole words

Submit your own question to Dr. Math

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

Math Forum Home || Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search

Ask Dr. MathTM
© 1994-2013 The Math Forum