Chaos Theory and the PendulumDate: 12/31/2001 at 04:50:45 From: Glenn Polii Subject: Chaos theory Greetings! I'm in the last grade in high school. I've read your explanations about chaos theory. I've been thinking of such things for a few years, since before I knew that other people have been thinking about such things too and call them "chaos theory." How is chaos theory related to physics? Date: 12/31/2001 at 09:23:08 From: Doctor Tom Subject: Re: Chaos theory Hi Glenn, This is a big site, and I'm not exactly sure what article you read here about chaos theory, but I can surely give you an example from physics. (It's actually a math problem, but the math is used to solve a physics problem.) A single pendulum is a rod hanging from a pivot that can swing back and forth. A double pendulum has one pendulum swinging from the tip of another pendulum. A triple pendulum hangs a third pendulum from the tip of the second, etc. It is quite easy to write down the equations of motion for any such system - single, double, triple, ..., pendulum systems. Both the single and double pendulum problems are well-behaved, but the triple (and quadruple, ...) pendulum problems are chaotic. Even the single pendulum problem cannot be solved analytically. (The usual "exact" solution you see is not exact - it assumes that the motion is very small and that for small angles of motion sin(x) = x.) But all the systems can be solved numerically. In other words, you can write down the differential equations of motions of the rods in the pendulums and take tiny time-steps with a computer problem to figure out what the system will look like 1/100 (or 1/1000 or 1/10000) of a second later. So if you know the initial configuration, and want to see what it looks like 10 seconds later, you can get a good idea by taking 1000 steps of 1/100 seconds. If that's not accurate enough for you, you can do 10000 steps of 1/1000 seconds, etc. Suppose you try to model a real system of pendulums. You need to measure the rods, weigh the rods, etc., and there will be some tiny error in measurement. Thus your initial conditions are not exact; they are only as accurate as your measuring devices. Suppose you've got really good measuring devices, and make an error of only 1/1000000 grams in mass or 1/1000000 centimeters in length. Obviously, the values your computer program will calculate are in error if you use your measured values instead of the calculated values. (I will assume that the computer is infinitely accurate - that there are no numerical errors in its calculations. We only assume that there is a measurement error made in the initial numbers and that the computer calculates perfectly, but beginning with imperfect numbers.) In the single and double pendulum case, imagine that you start two computers calculating with the "true" measurements and with your measurements that are in error. In the non-chaotic case, if you compare the solutions that the two programs give, they will stay close together. In other words, a small error at the start will result in a small error after a long calculation. But with a triple pendulum (or any chaotic system of equations), after a short time, the predicted positions of the pendulum parts will be completely different. How different depends on the accuracy of your measurements, but it is not too long. Suppose that the calculation goes wildly bad after 100 seconds, so you think, "Maybe I can get better results with more accurate initial measurements, or by making more time-steps between positions." So you measure everything 100 times as accurately, and you make your time steps 100 times smaller. The two calculations will agree for a longer time, but perhaps now it will be 110 seconds before the system calculations are wildly different. So for 100 times more work in measurement, you only get a 10% improvement in accuracy. This continues, and since it is really impossible to measure things to, say, one part in a million, any attempts to simulate the motion of a triple pendulum for a long time are doomed to failure. That's the basic idea of a chaotic system - it's usually an iterated system (where each calculation depends on the previous one), and where a tiny difference in the initial conditions leads relatively rapidly to wildly different results in the calculations. In other words, even with perfect calculations and a huge amount of computer time and more accurate measurements, you can't predict what the system will look like after a relatively small amount of time. - Doctor Tom, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/ |
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]
Ask Dr. Math^{TM}
© 1994-2013 The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/