Foil Wrapped Around a SpindleDate: 12/17/97 at 17:18:00 From: Liz Brown Subject: Integration? I have a problem in an engineering work environment. I have a tightly rolled sheet of foil wrapped around a spindle. I know the diameter of the spindle (Do) and the external diameter of the combined spindle and surrounding foil (Di) and the thickness of a sheet of foil (t). I need to know the length of foil (L) needed to generate the external diameter. I have been given a formula by word of mouth L = pi (square(Do) - square(Di) ) / 4t I need to know if this is an approximation of a more accurate formula as I am dealing with a thickness of 0.01 mm and the length calculation needs to be accurate for production purposes. Is it possible to prove from first principles? I would be grateful of any help you can give me. I did A level Maths but that was at least 15 years ago. Thank you. Date: 12/22/97 at 15:53:20 From: Doctor Mark Subject: Re: Integration? Hi Liz, If I understand your problem correctly, (Do) should be the diameter of the *spindle and surrounding foil* (so that it is Do(uter)), while (Di) should be the diameter of the *spindle alone* (so that it is Di(nner) - not that I am expecting you to eat it!). With that change in the definitions, then the formula you were given seems correct to me, though it is 1) an approximation of a sort and 2) more complicated than is necessary. I expect that the diameter of the spindle is much larger than the thickness of the foil. Is that right? That would be the case if the 0.01 mm represents the thickness of the foil, and if Di is of the order of a few mm or larger. If so, then the formula you were given is correct to a *very* good approximation. However, it is should also be the case that the thickness t of the foil should be the difference between Do and Di, t = Do - Di and so your formula actually reduces (by factoring the polynomial as: a^2 - b^2 = (a+b)(a-b), with a = Do, and b = Di) to L = pi ( [Di + Do]/2 ) That formula could more easily be derived by drawing a picture (which we can use to get the original formula as well). Draw two circles with the same center, one of radius Di (the i[nner] circle--the spindle), one of radius Do (the o[uter] circle - the spindle plus foil). The foil is represented by the region outside the inner circle and inside the outer circle. If you now draw a circle, with the same center as the first two, with its boundary (the circumference) halfway in between the two circles, then the diameter of this circle should be the average of the inner and outer diameters, i.e., of Di and Do. The circumference of this new circle will be pi times that average, and this circumference is (to a very good approximation, if t is small compared to Di) just L, given by the formula above this paragraph. Your original formula comes from finding the area of that region in between the two circles, which is: area between the two circles = area of outer circle - area of inner circle = pi [ (radius of outer circle)^2 - (radius of inner circle)^2 ] = pi [ (Do/2)^2 - (Di/2)^2 ] = pi [ {(Do)^2}/4 - {(Di)^2}/4 ] = pi [ (Do)^2 - (Di)^2 ]/4 If t is very small compared to Di and Do, then the region between the circles looks sort of like a very thin rectangle of length L and width t, wrapped around the circle of radius Di. Equating the area between the two circles to the the area of the rectangle, which is (length) x (width) = Lt, we get: Lt = pi [ (Do)^2 - (Di)^2 ]/4 Divide both sides by t, and this is your original formula. Personally, I would use the L = pi*(Do + Di)/2 formula, since it is less susceptible to small errors in the measurement of Do and Di. In fact, since Do and Di are almost the same, I would probably use the even simpler formula L = pi(Di). That is, the length of the foil is just the circumference of the spindle. I suspect that (again, if the thickness of the foil is a lot less than the diameter of the spindle) this would be good enough for most practical purposes. None of what I said is going to be true if, in fact, the foil is *not* really thin compared to the diameter of the spindle. Write back if that is what you need. Hope this has been of some help. -Doctor Mark, The Math Forum Check out our web site! http://mathforum.org/dr.math/ |
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]
Ask Dr. Math^{TM}
© 1994-2015 The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/