Associated Topics || Dr. Math Home || Search Dr. Math

### How Can a Line Have Length?

```
Date: 04/14/98 at 22:00:50
From: Magnus Collin
Subject: The impossibility of a line having Length

We have a line, OR a line segment, OR a ray (it really doesn't
matter). If this particular linear entity (let us say that it is a
line segment, for the sake of hypothetical simplicity) consists only
of infinite points, all with zero volume, mass, diamater, cross-
sectional area, etc., how can it have length?  Why are we able to take
a particular line segment and give it a length of 5?  If a substance
can only be composed of volumeless points, how can it have volume in
and of itself?

In other words, in Geometry class, the teacher might draw up a line on
the blackboard and put a tiny dot on it and call that miniature mark
"Point B." The mark of the chalk on the line is visible, and we tend
to see B as just a tiny little point on the line, and we think, "Oh,
there are infinite points right next to each other which make up the
line."  In reality, the points are 100% without substance; how can
they come together and make up one bigger continuous substance
(composed uniquely of volumeless points) which has the physical
property of length?

It would be like trying to add a bunch of zeros together, even an
infinite number, and hoping eventually to arrive at 5. Even if you
have infinite points, if each of them has a length of exactly zero,
they can never result in a new form that has length.

Thank you very much for your time, and I would really appreciate any
comments or fallacy which you might find in my logic.
```

```
Date: 04/15/98 at 12:19:43
From: Doctor Daniel
Subject: Re: The impossibility of a line having Length

Hi there,

How is it that Euclidean points (which have zero length, area, volume)
can unite to form Euclidean line segments (with length), planar faces
(with area) and solids (with volume)?

It's a fair question, and frankly, one that philosophers have
struggled with a lot. Here are a couple of quite similar ways it's

1) It's essentially defined away by concepts like calculus (in its
more advanced flavor of measure theory). There, the cardinal concept
really is that the line from 0 to 1 has length 1, and a point is
simply the interval between two lines that just touch. (Think about
the space from 0 to 1 on the number line and the space from 1 to 2.
The "interval" of their intersection is the point 1.) So it's not such
a big deal (in this manner of thinking) that their intersection has
length 0; even though the line is the union of the points, it is the
line that starts out with length 1, which causes the point (interval
with just 1 point) to have length 0, not the point of length 0 which
somehow unites to form something of length 1.

2) Here's a somewhat older way of dealing with the problem, which
dates to the 19th century. Think of a point as just being the limit of
the process "Take an interval and cut it in half." Obviously, the
point has length 0, but it's also clear that all of the intervals
along the way don't. It's just that, as the limit of this process, we
can't say that the point has length, say, .0000000000001, since I can
show you an interval that's even shorter that includes the point.

Both of these answers date to the last 100 years. Prior to that,
though, the question has a tremendously long history. Maybe you've
heard Zeno (a Greek philosopher)'s version, which is essentially:
"Why is it that 1 + 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + ... = 2?"  I do think there's a
great value in these answers, though, in that they typify what
mathematics has taught us in the last 100 years.

Good luck!

-Doctor Daniel,  The Math Forum
```
Associated Topics:
High School Euclidean/Plane Geometry
High School Geometry
High School History/Biography
Middle School Geometry
Middle School History/Biography
Middle School Two-Dimensional Geometry

Search the Dr. Math Library:

 Find items containing (put spaces between keywords):   Click only once for faster results: [ Choose "whole words" when searching for a word like age.] all keywords, in any order at least one, that exact phrase parts of words whole words

Submit your own question to Dr. Math
Math Forum Home || Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search