Fundamental Idea of Division
Date: 03/24/2000 at 21:11:34 From: Tess Ammerman Subject: Division My 8-year-old daughter had 12 bracelets that she arranged into 4 piles of 3. Did she divide 12 by 3 or by 4? Most people I've asked can only offer an opinion. What I'm looking for is a definitive answer, if there is one. My husband says the number of sets is the answer: 12 divided by 3 = 4. Most others I've asked said that the number in each set is the answer: 12 divided by 4 = 3. I asked my daughter to do a different problem, 12 divided by 2, to see what she did. She took 2 bracelets and made a pile and continued until she ran out of bracelets, then counted the piles to come up with the answer, 6. This is the way my husband would have done it but not the way the others I've asked or I would do it. I realize the answer is the same either way and thought it didn't matter until my husband gave me 48 items that needed to be divided for a meeting. As he left the room he asked me to divide the items by 8. When he returned I had made 8 neat piles of 6 items each. Unfortunately there were 6 people in attendance at the meeting and each needed 8 items. Thank you in advance for you help in this matter, Kelly Allen and Tess Ammerman
Date: 03/24/2000 at 23:18:56 From: Doctor Peterson Subject: Re: Division Hi, Kelly and Tess. We were asked a similar question recently, so you're not alone. The question then wasn't phrased in so thorough a fashion, so I had to play with ideas for a while before I came up with a clear answer. This time I think I'm ready, though you've added some interesting twists. I think you have to distinguish between the mathematical operation of division and the physical act of dividing into groups. Just as multiplying 6 by 8 can be equally well represented by 6 rows of 8 or 8 columns of 6; the division of 48 by 8 can represent either making groups of 8 until you run out after making 6 groups, or "dealing out" into 8 piles until you run out with 6 in each pile. Neither action has a monopoly on the name of division. So, first, your daughter was doing ALL of these: 3 x 4 = 12 4 x 3 = 12 12 / 3 = 4 12 / 4 = 3 Or rather, I could say she was doing NONE of them. She was arranging bracelets! She divided 12 by 4 if her goal was to make 4 piles; she divided 12 by 3 if her goal was to make piles of 3; she factored 12 into 3 x 4 if her goal was just to make the piles come out even. If she simply enjoyed the pattern, she wasn't dividing anything by anything, because she wasn't paying attention to the numbers. And in any case, what she did with her hands was not division of numbers; that's what her mind might have been doing. Second, if your husband asked me to divide 48 items by 8, when he returned he would have found a piece of paper with the number 6 written on it. He didn't say what action he wanted performed, which was to divide 48 items INTO SETS OF 8. Might he have actually said "Divide them by 8's"?) If I had recognized that he actually wanted me to form sets, though, I probably would have done what you did, simply because the emphasis on the 8 would suggest to me that there are 8 people coming. In other circumstances, where the size of a set is the important thing (say, dividing people "by 5" to assign them to cars for a trip), I would have taken it the other way. The root idea of division is to ask "How many times does 8 go into 48?" That is, how many 8's can I form? So the presumed action might be to form 6 sets of 8, counting out 8 at a time; I can understand your husband's seeing it that way. On the other hand, when your daughter "divided 12 by 2" by forming sets of 2, that seems odd to me because I think of dividing by two as forming halves. Again, it's the context that suggests the interpretation, not a fixed definition. You can count 8's equally well by dealing the items out into 8 piles, counting out 8 repeatedly. Someone listening to you couldn't tell which way you are grouping them; the difference is only in whether the items you put down are all in one pile after you've counted to 8, or are in 8 separate piles. The division (48 / 8 = 6) is the same, but the distribution of objects is different. I have to admit all this is just my opinion, not a definitive answer. I hope it makes sense and prevents arguments, rather than starting more! - Doctor Peterson, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
Search the Dr. Math Library:
Ask Dr. MathTM
© 1994- The Math Forum at NCTM. All rights reserved.