Pi, Irrational NumbersDate: 29 Dec 1994 19:48:56 -0500 From: Megin Charner Subject: For Sydney, from Sam Dear Sydney, Please tell me: What is Pi and how does it work? What are rational numbers and what are irrational numbers? How do they work? A joke: Why was the algebra book so sad? Thanks Partner, Sam Answer: Because it had a lot of problems...... he he he he he hehe he eheheheheheheehehehheehheeh Date: 30 Dec 1994 13:20:34 -0500 From: Dr. Sydney Subject: Re: For Sydney, from Sam Dear Sam, Hey there! How's it going? Sorry it took me a while to write back. I've been pretty busy here with Christmas activities. Anyway, I'm glad you wrote back! Pi is a number approximately equal to 3.14; that is, by definition, the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter. The circumference of a circle is the distance around the edge of the circle. The diameter of the circle is the length of the line that starts at one point on the circle, then goes through the center of the circle, and then goes through the point directly opposite the original point on the circle. I wish I could show you with a picture, but it is hard to draw on the computer, so maybe your mom, dad, or sister could draw you a picture. Anyway, early on, mathematicians realized that no matter how big or small a circle is, if you divide the circumference by the diameter, you always get the same number. What is so interesting about this number is that it is an infinite decimal. That means it has infinitely many numbers behind it's decimal point. Unlike numbers like 3, 9.876, and 4.5, which have finitely many nonzero numbers to the right of the decimal place, pi has infinitely many numbers to the right of the decimal point. Computers have calculated pi to lots and lots of decimal places (I'm not sure of an exact figure, sorry!). Another interesting thing about pi is that if you write it down in its decimal form (which we know is an infinite decimal), the numbers to the left of the 0 follow no pattern whatsoever. You see, some infinite decimals have patterns. For instance the infinite decimal .3333333... which has all 3's to the right of the decimal point, has a definite pattern -- every number is 3. Likewise, the number .123456789123456789123456789... also has a pattern -- the sequence 123456789 is repeated. Pi, on the other hand, has no such patterns. Many mathematicians have tried without success to find patterns. There are many other neat aspects to pi, but I don't want to overload you with stuff now. Perhaps one of the other math doctors will jump in with something about pi. On to your other question...before I can answer this, I must make sure you understand what an INTEGER is. An integer is a positive or negative whole number. So, 2, -28, and 0 are integers, but 2.5, pi, and -9.90 are not. A RATIONAL number is a number that can be expressed as a fraction where the numerator (the top number of the fraction) and the denominator (the bottom number in the fraction) are both INTEGERS. Numbers like 3, 2.5, and even -.333... are rational numbers because they can be represented as fractions with integer numerators and denominators. 3 = 3/1 and 2.5 = 5/2, and -.333... = -1/3. Showing this last one is a little tricky. You can test it out on a calculator, by dividing 1 by 3. You should get .333... Some numbers cannot be represented as a fraction with integer numerators and denominators. These numbers are called IRRATIONAL numbers. It can be proven that numbers with square roots, like the square root of 2, are irrational. That means the square root of 2 cannot be written as a fraction where the numerator and denominator are integers. As it turns out, there are a lot more irrational numbers than there are rational numbers. There are an infinite number of both kinds of numbers, but there are many many more irrational numbers than rational numbers. That's kind of fun to think about, yes? Well, I hope this helps. Write back if you have any more questions. Happy New Year! --Sydney, Dr. "math rocks" Foster |
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]
Ask Dr. Math^{TM}
© 1994-2015 The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/