Associated Topics || Dr. Math Home || Search Dr. Math

### Rounding 3.445 to the Tenths Place

```
Date: 05/24/2001 at 22:34:34
From: Joseph Sciammarella
Subject: Rounding numbers

In my daughter's 6th grade math class, they are told to address the
digit to the right of the place being rounded. For example, 3.445
rounded to the tenths place, would be 3.4, since the number to the
right of the tenth place is less than 5.

However, doesn't the presence of the 5 in the one-thousandths place
round the 4 hundredths to 5 hundredths, which in turn would round the
4 tenths to 5 tenths?

Thank you for your help. I have reviewed the archives, but haven't
come across this level of rounding.
```

```
Date: 05/25/2001 at 08:46:57
From: Doctor Rick
Subject: Re: Rounding numbers

Hi, Joseph.

There is no need to consider digits beyond the digit to the right of
the digit being rounded, except in one special case when using a
different rounding algorithm.

Consider what rounding means. If I have a number, say 3.445, and I
want to round it to the nearest tenth, this means I want to find the
nearest number that is an even multiple of one tenth. The two
candidates are the nearest such number below 3.445 (which is 3.4) and
the nearest such number above 3.445 (which is 3.5). How close are
these two candidates to 3.445?

3.5 - 3.445 = 0.055

3.445 - 3.4 = 0.045

The number 3.4 is therefore closer to 3.445 than is 3.5; so we should
round down to 3.4.

This is what your daughter's algorithm does: seeing that the digit in
the hundredths place is 4, she rounds down to 3.4.

When the digit to the right is 5, we may have a problem. Let's see if
we do. When we round 3.452 to the nearest tenth, our candidates are
3.4 and 3.5 again; the differences are:

3.5 - 3.452 = 0.048

3.452 - 3.4 = 0.052

The nearest candidate is 3.5, so this time we want to round up to 3.5.
This, again, is what your daughter's algorithm does: seeing that the
hundredths digit is 5, she rounds up.

But what about the number 3.45? Again the candidates are 3.4 and 3.5,
and the differences are:

3.5 - 3.45 = 0.05

3.45 - 3.4 = 0.05

The differences are identical, so there is no obvious choice for which
way we round! If I understand your daughter's algorithm correctly (the
way most school children are taught these days), she would see the 5
in the hundredths place and round up. This is a valid option.

You may be interested in the following item in our Archives, which
addresses another rounding algorithm that many people were taught. You
will see that, when properly applied, it only affects the last case I
showed, in which it would be equally valid to round in either
direction.

Rounding Decimals: Even/Odd Issues
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/problems/deborah.05.08.01.html

- Doctor Rick, The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
```

```
Date: 05/25/2001 at 09:01:56
From: Doctor Peterson
Subject: Re: Rounding numbers

Hi, Joseph.

The problem here is that you have to round all at once, not one digit
at a time. Rounding twice, to different digits, doesn't do what you
would think it would.

Here's what happens: Since 3.445 is closer to 3.4 than to 3.5, it must
round to 3.4; the border between 3.4 and 3.5 is at 3.45, and 3.445 is
below that. But if you first round it to the nearest hundredth, it
becomes 3.45, moving it from "below the border" to "right on the
border" and allowing a second rounding to move it "over the border" to
3.5.

It's as if the border patrol were to decree that anyone within ten
feet of the boundary fence should be considered to be on the fence;
and then said that anyone on the fence should be arrested for illegal
entry. That wouldn't be right, since people ten feet outside of the
country would be treated as if they were inside!

- Doctor Peterson, The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
```
Associated Topics:
Elementary Fractions
Elementary Place Value

Search the Dr. Math Library:

 Find items containing (put spaces between keywords):   Click only once for faster results: [ Choose "whole words" when searching for a word like age.] all keywords, in any order at least one, that exact phrase parts of words whole words

Submit your own question to Dr. Math
Math Forum Home || Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search