Associated Topics || Dr. Math Home || Search Dr. Math

### Significant Figures in 36 2/3

```
Date: 11/06/2001 at 15:58:11
From: E. S. Holzworth
Subject: Significant Figures

How many significant figures are there in the area "36 2/3 Acres"?

This type of notation for acreages is common in old deeds, yet with
current standards in most jurisdictions in the U.S.A., areas and
sub-areas are to be measured in acres to 4 decimal places (i.e.
36.6667 Acres). Any calculations based on the deeded area figure
should take significant figures into account.

My conclusion: 36 2/3 = 36.67 decimal.
```

```
Date: 11/07/2001 at 08:39:39
From: Doctor Peterson
Subject: Re: Significant Figures

Hi, E.S.

Interesting question! My first thought was to apply what I said here:

Fraction or Decimal?
http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/58148.html

To a mathematician, a fraction represents an exact number -
effectively, infinitely many decimal places. A decimal number might
represent an approximation, whose precision is implied by the number
of significant digits.

But it's also possible to take a fraction as a rough number:
"about 2/3." In that case, you can estimate its precision by thinking
of it as a quotient; since the numerator and denominator each have one
significant digit, it could be taken as having one significant digit,
so we would take it as 0.7. Since in addition it is not the number of
significant digits, but the number of decimal places that counts, and
since the whole part of a mixed number can be seen as a precise number
(constrained as it is to be a whole number), your number would then be
36.7, with three effective significant digits and one decimal place.

But legally, I would think the real issue would be to determine the
intent of the original deed, rather than to legalistically count
digits in the number as written. I doubt that precision was even
considered when it was written; so the only reasonable thing I can see
to do is to take it at face value as an exact number, and then rewrite
it according to modern standards as 36.6667 rounded to four decimal
places. Other considerations might have to be taken into account, such
as the accuracy of measurements used to calculated that figure, but I
can't see any better answer given what you have told me. Is there any
law dictating how to interpret old deeds?

- Doctor Peterson, The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
```
Associated Topics:
Elementary Fractions
Elementary Place Value

Search the Dr. Math Library:

 Find items containing (put spaces between keywords):   Click only once for faster results: [ Choose "whole words" when searching for a word like age.] all keywords, in any order at least one, that exact phrase parts of words whole words

Submit your own question to Dr. Math
Math Forum Home || Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search