|


What is the Definition of Zero? Who Invented the Symbol?
Date: 9 Jan 1995 12:18:50 -0500
From: David Chen
Subject: Ask a question
Hi, Dr. Math
I am a student from Monta Vista's Internet class and I am here to
ask you a question about math. I really wish that you can help me answer
the questions. My question is: What is the definition of zero, and who
invented or introduced the symbol to represent the zero?
Thanks in advance.
Sincerely, David Chen
Date: 10 Jan 1995 03:48:57 -0500
From: Dr. Sydney
Subject: Re: Ask a question
Dear David,
Hello! I'm glad you wrote to Dr. Math. The concept of zero is
surprisingly deep, and it took human thinkers quite a long time to come up
with the notion of zero. In fact, though mathematicians began thinking
about the concept of zero in 2000-1800 B.C.E., it was not until about 200-300
B.C.E. that the Babylonians began using a symbol that would evolve into
what we today know as zero.
It turns out that mathematicians first thought of zero in the
context of writing numbers down -- zero was first a placeholder. Before
mathematicians understood the notion of zero, there was much ambiguity
about written numbers. For instance, if the symbol for 5 was written down,
there was no way to tell what number was being expressed -- was it 5?
Or, 50? Or, 5,000,000? Thus, zero was introduced as a placeholder to avoid
these ambiguities.
In India, the concepts of 0 as a placeholder and 0 as a number were
associated with one another much earlier than in Babylon. It is from the
Indians that we get our present-day symbol for 0.
I don't have an exact definition for 0 here with me at home. I can
tell you this: when working with sets or groups of elements under some
defined operation of addition, the "zero element" is defined as the element,
let's call it z, such that a + z = a for all a in the set or group. So, one
definition you could use for 0 is that 0 + x = x for all real numbers x.
Alternatively, you might define 0 as the number in between the positive and
negative numbers. Or, maybe you could define 0 as lacking quantity (that's
what the dictionary says!) What do you think about these different
definitions? If you are looking for a different definition, write us back,
and we'll try to find a better one.
I hope this helps. Write back if you have any questions.
--Sydney, Dr. "whoa" math
|
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]


Ask Dr. MathTM
© 1994-2013 The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/