Associated Topics || Dr. Math Home || Search Dr. Math

### Checking Proportions using Square Roots

```Date: 04/11/2002 at 09:15:00
Subject: True proportions using square roots?

I am an 8th grade math teacher and our class is studying proportions.
While we were discussing different ways to decide if a specific
proportion is a true proportion (by cross-products or reducing the
fractions or decimal equivalents), a student suggested the following
method.

"Multiply the two fractions, and then take their square root. If it
equals one of the fractions you began with, it is a true proportion."

We tried his method with several examples and while it seems to work,
I was wary of saying it will work all of the time. What do you think?
```

```
Date: 04/11/2002 at 11:10:32
From: Doctor Ian
Subject: Re: True proportions using square roots?

Hi Erica,

That's a pretty clever observation!

Let's see what happens when we follow his advice. If we have a true
proportion, then it will look like this:

a   ka
- = --
b   kb

where k is the constant of proportionality. If we multiply the two
fractions together, we get

a   ka   a * ka
- * -- = ------
b   kb   b * kb

k   a * a
= - * -----
k   b * b

a * a
= -----
b * b

And the square root of this will, in fact, be one of the fractions,
assuming that at least one of the fractions was in reduced form to
begin with.

ma   kma
-- = ---
mb   kmb

then the product is

ma  kma   ma * kma
- * --- = --------
mb  kmb   mb * kmb

km   a * a
= -- * -----
km   b * b

a * a
= -----
b * b

And the square root of this won't be either of the fractions.  So the
trick works for, say,

2    8             16           4     2
- = --   =>  sqrt( -- ) = sqrt( - ) = -
3   12             36           9     3

but it doesn't work for, say,

4    8             32           4     2
- = --   =>  sqrt( -- ) = sqrt( - ) = -
6   12             72           9     3

So it depends in part on how you're using the word 'equal'. If you say
that the trick works in the latter case because 2/3 is 'equal' to 4/6,
then you're right, the trick works, but in order to establish that it
works, you have to solve the same kind of problem that you started out
with.

or anything else.

- Doctor Ian, The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
```

```
Date: 04/11/2002 at 22:07:29
Subject: True proportions using square roots?

Dear Dr. Ian,

not reduced, such as

ma   kma
-- = ---
mb   kmb

when I multiply them, won't they equal

ma   kma      k m m a a
-- = ---   =  ---------   ?
mb   kmb      k m m b b

Then if I take the square root of the result, it will be

k m m a a     ma      k       ma
sqrt ---------- =  -- sqrt -    =  --
k m m b b     mb      k       mb

so then that would be one of the fractions we started with.

But I understand what you said, that if we change to decimal
equivalents then the idea works. I will present the solution to the
class tomorrow.  I would appreciate it if you can comment on the
argument above.

Thanks so much for your help.  My class and I appreciate it.

Wayne Highlands Middle School, PA
```

```
Date: 04/12/2002 at 08:27:47
From: Doctor Ian
Subject: Re: True proportions using square roots?

Hi Erica,

You're right - I left out an m in both the numerator and denominator
of the product.  But the idea is still the same (which is why the
second example in my previous message ended up with a fraction other
than the two I started with).

That is,
________     ______     ____
| km^2 a^2    | km^2    | a^2
| -------- =  | ---- *  | --- = a/b
\| km^2 b^2   \| km^2   \| b^2

which is not one of the original fractions.  It doesn't matter whether
you're canceling m/m or (m^2)/(m^2).

To get back to the original fraction, you'd have to _partially_ reduce
the fraction inside the square root, which would be sort of an odd
thing to do. (If you know enough to cancel out a factor of k, but not
a factor of m^2, that would indicate that you already _know_ that
there is a constant of proportionality, which would raise the question
of why you're doing the trick at all.)

You're absolutely correct that changing everything to decimal
equivalents would make the trick work, but changing the original
fractions to decimal equivalents would make the trick unnecessary in
the first place. That is, after you've done that, you can just compare
the two decimal numbers directly:

3   12
- = --
8   32

0.375 = 0.375

Now the 'trick' reduces to taking the square root of a number
multiplied by itself:

______________
0.375 = \| 0.375 * 0.375

those situations that shows why working with variables can give you
more insight than looking at examples using numbers.

Does this help?

- Doctor Ian, The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
```
Associated Topics:
Middle School Fractions
Middle School Ratio and Proportion

Search the Dr. Math Library:

 Find items containing (put spaces between keywords):   Click only once for faster results: [ Choose "whole words" when searching for a word like age.] all keywords, in any order at least one, that exact phrase parts of words whole words

Submit your own question to Dr. Math
Math Forum Home || Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search