Describing Patterns in SequencesDate: 04/16/2002 at 21:40:29 From: Carrie Mack Subject: Patterning Hi, My students have just started examining number patterns. They are able to identify the number pattern corresponding to a number sequence, but are having difficulty explaining it in words. I have to make these descriptions as simple as possible, and am having some difficulty writing a description for the following: 1 3 6 10 15 ... They can identify what's happening (going up by 2, 3, 4, 5, etc.) but can't grasp the language. How would you explain it using a general description? I hope this is clear. Thanks a bunch! Carrie Date: 04/16/2002 at 23:37:18 From: Doctor Peterson Subject: Re: Patterning Hi, Carrie. I often struggle myself when students ask about sequences, because there are many different ways to look at them, and I'm never quite sure which will be easiest for a particular student to grasp, or will look like the most natural way to see it. Part of the problem, of course, is that I see these things from a higher perspective, and am too familiar with the concepts. In this case, you are probably aware of several ways to state what this sequence is: the triangular numbers successive partial sums of the series 1+2+3+... explicitly: a[n] = n(n+1)/2 recursively: a[1] = 1, a[n] = a[n-1] + n The last expresses in rather advanced terms the observation you made. But students aren't going to follow that. I'd like to see you do an experiment with your class, and just let them brainstorm ways to describe the pattern. As I've suggested, there are many valid ways to state it, and many ways also to approach a full description starting with simple observations. It could be a useful exercise for them to come up with their own list of ways to describe it, and perhaps even a chart of different paths to the realization of what this sequence really is. You might challenge them to find as many observations as they can about the sequence, and then to decide which they would start with if they were discussing it with younger students, and which, on the other hand, give the clearest and most complete explanation of the nature of the pattern. I suppose that's cheating, letting them find the answer to your question for you; but it just might teach the subject better than just telling them what to say about it. Here is one route they might find: We can first look for a recursive pattern, that is, a pattern in the way each term relates to the one before it. In this case, we see that the difference between successive terms increases constantly: terms: 1 3 6 10 15 differences: 2 3 4 5 Now we might want to clarify just what we mean by "increasing"; how are the differences increasing? One way is to look at the second difference; what is the difference from one difference to the next? We see that it is always 1: terms: 1 3 6 10 15 differences: 2 3 4 5 second diff: 1 1 1 But that's awfully hard to grasp. We might instead look for a way to describe the differences explicitly; it can help here to write down the index of each term next to it in order to compare: indexes: 1 2 3 4 5 terms: 1 3 6 10 15 differences: 2 3 4 5 Now we can see that the difference we add to each term to get the next is the index of the next term. That makes it a lot easier to describe the pattern: to get term N, add N to the previous term. That's a perfectly good description of the pattern. But there's another direction we could go in. Looking back at the differences, we can see terms: 1 3 6 10 15 differences: 2 3 4 5 cumulative sums: 1 + 2=3 1 + 2 + 3=6 1 + 2 + 3 + 4=10 So we've turned a recursive pattern into one that generates each term as a sum. I don't know whether this is helpful to you, or even comes near what you are really asking; but if it only shows that there are many ways to talk about the same pattern, and that that observation itself is useful to students, perhaps it can help. - Doctor Peterson, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/ |
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]
Ask Dr. Math^{TM}
© 1994- The Math Forum at NCTM. All rights reserved.
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/