Associated Topics || Dr. Math Home || Search Dr. Math

### Sine and Secant

```Date: 04/30/2002 at 22:15:34
From: Vaughn Wassmer
Subject: Sine and Secant

When someone applied the terms sine, cosine, tangent, secant,
cosecant, and cotangent to the trigonometric functions, why didn't
they make secant the reciprocal of sine and cosecant the reciprocal of
cosine instead of the other way around, with cosecant being the
reciprocal of sine and secant being the reciprocal of cosine? Why
don't they just do it like they did with cotangent being the
reciprocal of tangent?  It would make it a lot easier to remember,
don't you think?
```

```
Date: 05/01/2002 at 09:22:32
From: Doctor Peterson
Subject: Re: Sine and Secant

Hi, Vaughn.

If you saw where the names come from, as in

Origin of the Terms Sine, Cosine, Tangent, etc.
http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/52578.html

then you know why secant IS called secant. Since there is a reason to
call it secant, there is no reason to call it the cosecant.

You are supposing that trig functions ought to be named in such a way
that "co's" are reciprocals of other "co's". But there's no such rule;
the only general rule is that

co-f(x) = f(90-x)

(in degrees). That is, the "co-something" is the "something" of the
complement. That's how tangent and cotangent are related, though they
also happen to be reciprocals. There is no naming convention that
indicates which functions are reciprocals. (But I'll suggest below
that it really is more consistent than you realize.)

The name "secant" refers to its representing the length of the secant
line OB in Dr. Rick's picture. If we gave the name cosecant to that
function, then the secant would not be the length of a secant line.
In fact, there is no line you can draw on that picture, without a lot
of contortions, that would represent the cosecant; so it is natural
to give primary names to the functions that do have a simple meaning
(sine, tangent, and secant), and to name the other three as
co-functions of those.

What's happening here is that, whereas trigonometry started in
geometry, with each function having a clear relation to a circle, you
now look at it just as arbitrary functions and expect the names to
follow an abstract pattern that tells you what they mean from the name
alone. If we were to start over and give names to the functions based
only on their relation to the sine and cosine, we could certainly come
up with a scheme that would meet your expectations; and it might be
easier to work with, now that nobody thinks in terms of Latin names
for parts of a diagram. But historically it makes perfect sense how
the names are assigned, and it's not really hard to memorize their
relationships. For one thing, it's convenient that the reciprocal of
any "non-co" function is a "co" function. I find that actually easier
to follow than if it were the other way. Here is a diagram that
illustrates the relationships:

sin   cos
\ /
tan ----+---- cot    Opposites are reciprocals
/ \
sec   csc

<--------------->
complements

- Doctor Peterson, The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
```
Associated Topics:
High School Trigonometry

Search the Dr. Math Library:

 Find items containing (put spaces between keywords):   Click only once for faster results: [ Choose "whole words" when searching for a word like age.] all keywords, in any order at least one, that exact phrase parts of words whole words

Submit your own question to Dr. Math
Math Forum Home || Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search