|


Geometric Proof of the Steiner-Lehmus TheoremDate: 05/13/2002 at 01:42:14 From: Jim Subject: Plane Geometry Prove: If two bisectors of two angles of a triangle are equal then the triangle is an isosceles triangle. What I am looking for is a "geometric proof" where algebra isn't involved. I suppose if one were to use trigonometry and analytic geometry the proof would be even easier. I've seen a geometric proof that was quite long and involved but I've misplaced it. But it seems as if such a simple problem should have a simple (geometric) solution!
Date: 05/13/2002 at 16:16:52
From: Doctor Floor
Subject: Re: Plane Geometry
This is called the Steiner-Lehmus theorem. Here is a geometric proof:
We consider given that ABC is a triangle, AD and BE bisect angles A
and B such that AD = BE.
Start by constructing F such that AF = AE and DF = AB. Let G be the
intersection of AD and BE.
We find ADF and EBA are congruent, so
<FAD = <AEB and <ADF = 1/2 <B
In triangles AGE and BGD we find
<AEB + 1/2 <A = <ADB + 1/2 <B
<FAD + 1/2 <A = <ADB + <ADF
<FAB = <BDF
We also find that these final angles are
<AEB + 1/2 <A = <AGB
= 180 -(<A + <B)/2 > pi/2
From this we can conclude the congruence of BAF and FDB despite only
having SSA, because the unknown angles must be acute. So DB = AF = AE
and thus 1/2 <A = 1/2 <B, and we see that ABC is isosceles.
If you have more questions, just write back.
Best regards,
- Doctor Floor, The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
Date: 05/14/2002 at 02:08:55 From: Jim Subject: Plane Geometry Thank you very much! That was exactly what I was looking for. Very short and not too complicated. Bravo.
Date: 10/14/2003 at 00:34:22
From: Daniel
Subject: Geometric Proof of the Steiner-Lehmus Theorem
I was happy to find a simple geometric proof of the Steiner-Lehmus
theorem on your site, but as I was reading through the proof there
was one step which I just could not understand how it was done.
In triangles AGE and BGD we find
<AEB + 1/2 <A = <ADB + 1/2 <B
<FAD + 1/2 <A = <ADB + <ADF
<FAB = <BDF <----- This is the step
I do not understand how this follows from the previous steps. It
would evidently follow from <FAD - 1/2 <A = <ADB - <ADF
but not from <FAD + 1/2<a = <ADB + <ADF
Any help would be appreciated,
Daniel
Date: 10/14/2003 at 12:04:09
From: Doctor Peterson
Subject: Re: Geometric Proof of the Steiner-Lehmus Theorem
Hi, Daniel.
The proof should state which of two possible points is to be chosen
as F; when I tried going through the theorem just now, I made the
same mistake you made, and drew F below AD rather than above AD (at
F' below):
C
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
F----------------- \
\ E -----------------D
\ / \ / / \
\ / \ / / \
\ / G / \
\ / / \ / \
\ / / /\ \
\ / / / \ \
\ / / / \ \
\ / / / \ \
A--------------------/----------------B
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
F'
With F on the same side of AD as C, as shown, the angles add up
so that
<FAD + 1/2 <A = <FAB
<ADB + <ADF = <BDF
If you have any further questions, feel free to write back.
- Doctor Peterson, The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
|
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]


Ask Dr. MathTM
© 1994-2013 The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/