Factoring a Fifth-Degree PolynomialDate: 08/15/2002 at 14:42:36 From: Mike Cooper Subject: Factoring this specific problem Hi and thanks for your help. The problem is simplify this rational expression: x^5+x^4-4x^3-4x^2 ----------------- x^5+4x^4+4x^3 I have no problem with the denominator but I am working from a teachers' manual and it shows the factorization of the numerator as follows: x^5+x^4-4x^3-4x^2 = x^2[(x^3+x^2-4x-4)] = this I understand. x^2[(x^3-4x)+(x^2-4)] = this is a bit confusing. Why is the first term combined with the third and the second with the fourth, and why the plus sign between the two? Anyway, it continues: x^2[x(x^2-4)+(x^2-4)] = I get this factorization based on the previous one with the plus, which I hope you can help me understand. Now here is another part I need help with: x^2[(x^2-4)(x+1)] Here I get lost. Where did the x go, and where does this (x+1) come from, and what happened to the plus? I do these all the time, but this one for some reason is not coming to me. It ends, x^2(x-2)(x+2)(x+1) which I get from the previous line. Help! Date: 08/15/2002 at 16:06:04 From: Doctor Peterson Subject: Re: Factoring this specific problem Hi, Mike. Factoring fifth degree polynomials is often more magic than method; it requires tricky thinking and a bit of luck! I'll first explain the way they did it, and then suggest what to my mind is a much better approach. You are factoring x^5 + x^4 - 4x^3 - 4x^2 and get this far: x^2(x^3 + x^2 - 4x - 4) Ignore the x^2 on the outside; we need to factor x^3 + x^2 - 4x - 4 Now they are factoring by grouping, looking for two pairs of terms that have a common factor. They seem to see that you have two 1's and two -4's, so they separate it into two pairs of terms, each with a 1 and a 4: x^3 - 4x and x^2 - 4. They get this just by changing the order, switching the two middle terms around to get x^3 - 4x + x^2 - 4 and then put in the parentheses to group the pairs: (x^3 - 4x) + (x^2 - 4) Now they factor out the common factor x in the first pair: x(x^2 - 4) + (x^2 - 4) Now, as they had hoped, they see that this is the sum of two multiples of (x^2 - 4), so they can use the distributive property in reverse to combine these: x times A plus 1 times A is (x+1) times A: (x^2 - 4)(x + 1) I would have written it as (x + 1)(x^2 - 4), but it's the same thing. And I would have seen different pairs; two 1's and two 4's to me imply that we can pair neighbors like this: x^3 + x^2 - 4x - 4 = (x^3 + x^2) + (-4x - 4) = x^2(x + 1) - 4(x + 1) = (x^2 - 4)(x + 1) = (x + 2)(x - 2)(x + 1) That's no less work, but more obvious to me than swapping terms. Now, let's see how we could simply your original expression without having to see how to factor that cubic, which is a hard job. Here's the problem: x^5 + x^4 - 4x^3 - 4x^2 ----------------------- x^5 + 4x^4 + 4x^3 When your goal is to simplify something, you hope to find common factors. So if you find a factor of the denominator, you can try it out in the numerator and see whether it works. It's not obvious that starting in the denominator is a good idea until we first factor out powers of x: x^2(x^3 + x^2 - 4x - 4) ----------------------- x^3(x^2 + 4x + 4) Now we see that the denominator has a quadratic, which we can factor by standard methods: x^2(x^3 + x^2 - 4x - 4) ----------------------- x^3(x + 2)^2 Okay, if the numerator is worth factoring, it's only because there's something that will cancel. So the only factor worth finding is x+2. Therefore, we just try dividing x^3+x^2-4x-4 by x+2 to see if it is a factor, and we find that x^3 + x^2 - 4x - 4 = (x + 2)(x^2 - x - 2) So our expression is now x^2(x + 2)(x^2 - x - 2) ----------------------- x^3(x + 2)^2 At this point we can cancel: (x^2 - x - 2) ------------- x(x + 2) Now all that's left is to factor the numerator; we might as well see if we can cancel the remaining x+2, but it turns out that it doesn't go. Factoring, we get (x - 2)(x + 1) ------------- x(x + 2) That's the answer, without ever factoring a cubic. Or, since I'm not convinced that factored form is simpler, you could just stop with x^2 - x - 2 ----------- x^2 + 2x I think this approach is a lot more intelligent than forcing yourself to factor a cubic from scratch. But I suppose you have to learn to factor them anyway, at least for tests, so the exercise was worth something. If you have any further questions, feel free to write back. - Doctor Peterson, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/ Date: 08/15/2002 at 16:12:13 From: Doctor Ian Subject: Re: Factoring this specific problem Hi Mike, Ultimately, they want to combine the terms this way because it will make things easier to factor. Here's what's going on. (Note that x^0 = 1. Note also that when you have a bunch of additions, it doesn't matter what order you do them in, or how you group them.) x^3 + x^2 - 4x - 4 = x^3 + x^2 - 4x^1 - 4x^0 Make exponents explicit. = x^3 + x^2 + -4x^1 + -4x^0 Change to additions. = x^3 + -4x^1 + x^2 + -4x^0 Change order of additions. = (x^3 + -4x^1) + (x^2 + -4x^0) Change order of additions. = (x^3 - 4x^1) + (x^2 - 4x^0) Change back to subtractions. = (x^3 - 4x) + (x^2 - 4) >x^2[(x^2-4)(x+1)] Okay, let's slow it down again: x(x^2 - 4) + (x^2 - 4) = x(x^2 - 4) + 1(x^2 - 4) Make the 1 explicit. a( c ) + b( c ) (a + b)( c ) = (x + 1)(x^2 - 4) Apply distributive property. I think that last one threw you because you may not be used to thinking of the distributive property as applying to terms bigger than a single variable. Does this help? - Doctor Ian, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/ Date: 08/15/2002 at 20:49:53 From: Mike Cooper Subject: Thank you Thanks so much for your help. Sometimes obvious things look like Greek to me as I try to help the kids with their algebra, and you always save the day. Your help is invaluable. Mike |
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]
Ask Dr. Math^{TM}
© 1994- The Math Forum at NCTM. All rights reserved.
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/