Associated Topics || Dr. Math Home || Search Dr. Math

### Why Straightedge and Compass Only?

```Date: 10/02/2002 at 13:39:17
From: Helen White
Subject: Geometry Constructions

My Geometry students want to know why constructions can only be done
using a straightedge and a compass. They want to know why they can't
just measure a line segment to copy it or use a protractor to
construct an angle. What's the difference?  We have searched our book
as well as some internet sites containing constructions, but to no
avail.

Thanks,

Ms. White
Wasatch Junior High
```

```
Date: 10/03/2002 at 09:14:43
From: Doctor Peterson
Subject: Re: Geometry Constructions

Hi, Ms. White.

Here is a brief answer I gave to a related question:

The Importance of Geometry Constructions
http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/52326.html

There are two ways that I can see to explain the restrictive rules for
constructions, which come to us from the ancient Greeks:

1. They are just the rules of a game mathematicians play. There are
many other ways to do constructions, but the compass and straightedge
were chosen as one set of tools that make a construction challenging,
by limiting what you are allowed to do, just as sports restrict what
you can do (e.g. touching but not tackling, or tackling but no
nuclear weapons) in order to keep a game interesting. Other tools
could have been chosen instead; for example, geometric constructions
can be done using origami.

2. They are the basis of an axiomatic system, with the goal of
ensuring that geometry is built on a solid foundation. Euclid wanted
to start with as few assumptions as possible, so that all of his
conclusions would be certain if you just accepted those few things. So
he listed five postulates (in addition to some other assumptions even
more basic); I've taken these from the reference given in my answer
above:

Postulate 1.
[It is possible] to draw a straight line from any point to any
point.

Postulate 2.
[It is possible] to produce a finite straight line continuously
in a straight line.

Postulate 3.
[It is possible] to describe a circle with any center and radius.

Postulate 4.
That all right angles equal one another.

Postulate 5.
That, if a straight line falling on two straight lines makes the
interior angles on the same side less than two right angles, the
two straight lines, if produced indefinitely, meet on that side
on which are the angles less than the two right angles.

The first two postulates say that you can use a straightedge: line it
up with two given points, and draw the line between them, or line it
up with an existing segment, and draw the line beyond it. That's the
first tool you are allowed to use, and those are the only ways you
are allowed to use it.

The third postulate says you can use a compass to draw a circle, given
the center and radius (or a point on the circle). That is the only way
you are allowed to use the compass; you can't, for example, draw a
circle tangent to a line by adjusting its radius until it _looks_
tangent, without knowing a specific point the circle has to pass
through.

The last two postulates relate to angles, and are less associated with
the construction process itself than with what you see when you are
done.

So really the two tools Euclid required for a construction just
represent the assumptions he was willing to make: if these two tools
work, then you can construct everything he talks about. For example,
you can use these tools, in the prescribed manner, to construct a
tangent to a given circle through a given point; but it takes some
thought to find how to do so (without just drawing a line that _looks_
tangent), and it takes several theorems to show that it really works.

Of course you CAN just measure a line or an angle, if your goal is
just to make a drawing - and usually that will be more accurate than
a complicated compass construction! But when you use only the tools
allowed in this game, you are actually playing within an axiomatic
system, getting a feel for how proofs work. You are simultaneously
playing a challenging game, and doing one of the few things in life
that can give you absolute certainty: if these lines and circles were
exactly what they pretend to be (with no thickness, etc.), then the
point I construct would be exactly what I claim it is. And it's that
sense of certainty that the Greeks were looking for.

If you have any further questions, feel free to write back.

- Doctor Peterson, The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
```
Associated Topics:
High School Constructions
High School History/Biography
High School Logic

Search the Dr. Math Library:

 Find items containing (put spaces between keywords):   Click only once for faster results: [ Choose "whole words" when searching for a word like age.] all keywords, in any order at least one, that exact phrase parts of words whole words

Submit your own question to Dr. Math
Math Forum Home || Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search