Naming Geometric and Arithmetic ProgressionsDate: 04/04/2003 at 01:04:45 From: Manny Subject: Geometric progression Why is an exponential progression called "geometric"? Does the name originate from the mean proportional relations among segments of right triangles? And why is a linear progression called "arithmetic"? Date: 04/06/2003 at 23:03:45 From: Doctor Peterson Subject: Re: Geometric progression Hi, Manny. I've often wondered about the exact history of these terms, but have never found any definitive explanation. The arithmetic, geometric, and harmonic sequences and means were all known and studied by the Greeks, but I don't have a source to show me what they called them in Greek, to confirm how far back the terms go. I have the general impression that a sequence that grows by addition was considered to be essentially based on arithmetic (where addition is fundamental), whereas one that grows by multiplication was important in geometry (in connection with the proportionality of similar figures, most likely). It is certainly possible that the simplicity of the construction of the geometric mean using a right triangle (which is based on the similarities you mention) may be involved. The most useful information I've found is this, from D. E. Smith's History of Mathematics: The early writers often used _proportio_ to designate a series, and this usage is found as late as the 18th century. The most common use of the word, however, limited it to four terms. Thus the early writers spoke of an arithmetic proportion, meaning b-a=d-c, as in 2,3,4,5; and of a geometric proportion, meaning a:b=c:d, as in 2,4,5,10. To these proportions the Greeks added the harmonic progression 1/b - 1/a = 1/d - 1/c, as where a=1/2, b=1/3, c=1/4, and d=1/5. These three names are now applied to series. To them the Greeks added seven others, all of which go back at least to Eudoxus (c. 370 B.C.). The Renaissance writers began to exclude several of these, and at the present time we have only the geometric proportion left, and so the adjective has been dropped and we speak of proportion alone. That is, the original idea was apparently that of a "proportion," or relation, among four items, which was considered in a broader sense than our current use of the word "proportion" as an equality of ratios. They used it also of the equality of differences (arithmetic) and of reciprocals (harmonic), as well as our "geometric" proportion. This still doesn't really tell us just why these terms were used, but it at least fits with my general impression. I looked in the Oxford English Dictionary to see if it would shed any light on this question, and found this note under "geometrical": _Arithmetical progression_, _proportion_, _ratio_, etc. ... relate to differences instead of quotients. The term _geometrical_ points to the fact that problems involving multiplication were originally dealt with by geometry and not by arithmetic. I'd still like to find more definitive information, but at least this more or less agrees with my impression. - Doctor Peterson, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/ |
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]
Ask Dr. Math^{TM}
© 1994-2013 The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/