Associated Topics || Dr. Math Home || Search Dr. Math

### What is a Sign?

```Date: 04/21/2003 at 13:27:59
From: Emma
Subject: Signs: operational and positive/negative

Can you do anything in math without signs?

I don't believe this is possible because all the math I have done
concerned signs. Addition, subtraction, multipication, division,
positive, and negative signs. Is a radical a sign?  Is an exponent a
sign? When doing 4(3) aren't the parentheses signs?
```

```
Date: 04/21/2003 at 15:01:40
From: Doctor Peterson
Subject: Re: Signs: operational and positive/negative

Hi, Emma.

This is an interesting question, but we have to start by asking what
you mean by "sign." My first question is, is even a _number_ a sign?

The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines "sign," in part, as

1 a : a motion or gesture by which a thought is expressed or a
b : SIGNAL 2a
c : a fundamental linguistic unit that designates an object or
relation or has a purely syntactic function
d : one of a set of gestures used to represent language; also
: SIGN LANGUAGE
2 : a mark having a conventional meaning and used in place of
words or to represent a complex notion
3 : one of the 12 divisions of the zodiac
4 a (1) : a character (as a flat or sharp) used in musical notation
(2) : SEGNO
b : a character (as ÷) indicating a mathematical operation; also
: one of two characters + and - that form part of the symbol
of a number and characterize it as positive or negative

So in some sense any communication other than words can be called a
sign (def. 1), which might include everything we write in math,
including numbers and even words; in a more specific sense (def. 4b),
only operations would be called signs; more specifically yet, signs
are only the positive and negative signs on a number. It isn't clear
whether the more general mathematical definition should include
parentheses, but I would assume so, since they are closely related to
the operations. So you have to decide for yourself which definition

But even if you include as signs every symbol we use in math except
numbers and letters, I think the answer to your question is this:
Yes, we do math all the time without writing, and therefore not using
signs; and in fact for most of history there _were_ no signs of
operations, and everything was written out either in words or in
early notation, in which symbols have started to take over from
words, but many words and abbreviations are still used:

Earliest Uses of Grouping Symbols - Jeff Miller
http://jeff560.tripod.com/grouping.html
_______________
B in D quad + B in D is used to represent B(D2 + BD).

This expression from the 1600's, translated from Latin into English,
would look something like this:

B by (D sq + B by D)

where you can see that the words "by" (short for "multiplied by")
and "sq" (short for "squared") are mixed with symbols for addition
and grouping.

Not too long before this, symbols of any sort were very rare. Here is
an example of algebra (which today is almost inconceivable without
writing down equations) as explained by one of its inventors:

Abu Ja'far Muhammad ibn Musa Al-Khwarizmi
http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/Mathematicians/Al-Khwarizmi.html

Al-Khwarizmi then shows how to solve the six standard types of
equations. He uses both algebraic methods of solution and
geometric methods. For example to solve the equation x^2 + 10x = 39
he writes [11]:-

... a square and 10 roots are equal to 39 units. The question
therefore in this type of equation is about as follows: what is
the square which combined with ten of its roots will give a sum
total of 39? The manner of solving this type of equation is to
take one-half of the roots just mentioned. Now the roots in the
problem before us are 10. Therefore take 5, which multiplied by
itself gives 25, an amount which you add to 39 giving 64. Having
taken then the square root of this which is 8, subtract from it
half the roots, 5 leaving 3. The number three therefore
represents one root of this square, which itself, of course is 9.
Nine therefore gives the square.

It is very awkward to do this level of math without having any way to
write out what you are doing; that is why the invention of modern
algebraic notation was so important in the development of math. But
with just an abacus and Roman numerals or Egyptian hieroglyphics,
people did ordinary calculations for centuries without even a symbol
for '+'. So although important math is very hard to do without
symbols, the world got along fine without them for a very long time!

But on the other hand, if you merely mean, "Is there anything you do
in math that can't be considered a "sign" in the sense of being an
operation that you _could_ write as a symbol?", then I think we have
to say no. The operations we represent by symbols are the verbs of
math, and without them, there is nothing to be done.

If you have any further questions, feel free to write back.

- Doctor Peterson, The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
```
Associated Topics:
Elementary Definitions
Elementary Math History/Biography
High School Definitions
High School History/Biography
Middle School Definitions
Middle School History/Biography

Search the Dr. Math Library:

 Find items containing (put spaces between keywords):   Click only once for faster results: [ Choose "whole words" when searching for a word like age.] all keywords, in any order at least one, that exact phrase parts of words whole words

Submit your own question to Dr. Math
Math Forum Home || Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search