Associated Topics || Dr. Math Home || Search Dr. Math

### Do Fractions Have to be Equal?

```Date: 05/09/2003 at 11:13:16
From: Phil Collins
Subject: Fractions

My grandson's textbook defines fractions as "one or more of the equal
parts of a whole." Is this true? Do the parts of the whole have to be
equal?
```

```
Date: 05/09/2003 at 15:07:46
From: Doctor Peterson
Subject: Re: Fractions

Hi, Phil.

The book is correct, though there can be some misunderstandings about
what it is saying.

When we name a fraction such as 1/3, we mean that you COULD obtain
this amount by cutting three EQUAL pieces and taking one of them. We
don't necessarily mean that you DID cut it just that way. But we do
mean that if you cut a pie into three DIFFERENT pieces, they can't
all be called thirds.

Here is a pie cut into thirds (as well as I can do so in text!):

ooooooooo
oooooo.........oooooo
ooo.................../ ooo
oo...................../     oo
oo....................../        oo
o......................./           o
o......................./             o
o......................./               o
o......................./                 o
o....................../                  o
o....................../                    o
o---------------------.                     o
o                      \                    o
o                      \                  o
o                       \                 o
o                       \               o
o                       \             o
o                       \           o
oo                      \        oo
oo                     \     oo
ooo                   \ ooo
oooooo         oooooo
ooooooooo

All three pieces are equal, and I have chosen one of them, so that
piece is 1/3 of the pie.

Here is a pie cut into three pieces that are not equal, but the chosen
piece is still 1/3, because I COULD have made it the same way as
before:

ooooooooo
oooooo.........oooooo
ooo.................../ ooo
oo...................../     oo
oo....................../        oo
o......................./           o
o......................./             o
o......................./               o
o......................./                 o
o....................../                  o
o....................../                    o
o---------------------+---------------------o
o                                           o
o                                         o
o                                         o
o                                       o
o                                     o
o                                   o
oo                               oo
oo                           oo
ooo                     ooo
oooooo         oooooo
ooooooooo

Only the shaded piece is actually 1/3; the others happen to be 1/6
and 1/2. Because they are not equal, we can't call them thirds. But
the shaded piece is the same size as the third I made before, so it
can be called 1/3.

Here is another pie, which I cut into six pieces, but I chose two of
them; the shaded area is still 1/3, because again I could have cut it
into three equal pieces to get the same amount:

ooooooooo
oooooo.........oooooo
ooo.\................./ ooo
oo.....\.............../     oo
oo........\............./        oo
o...........\.........../           o
o.............\........./             o
o...............\......./               o
o.................\...../                 o
o..................\.../                  o
o....................\./                    o
o---------------------+---------------------o
o                    / \                    o
o                  /   \                  o
o                 /     \                 o
o               /       \               o
o             /         \             o
o           /           \           o
oo        /             \        oo
oo     /               \     oo
ooo /                 \ ooo
oooooo         oooooo
ooooooooo

(Of course, this can also be called 2/6, which is equivalent to 1/3.)

And here is a pie that I cut into three unequal pieces, none of which
is a third:

ooooooooo
oooooo....|    oooooo
ooo..........|          ooo
oo.............|             oo
oo...............|               oo
o.................|                 o
o..................|                  o
o...................|                   o
o....................|                    o
o....................|                    o
o.....................|                     o
o---------------------*                     o
o                      \                    o
o                     \                   o
o                      \                  o
o                     \                 o
o                     \               o
o                    \              o
oo                   \           oo
oo                 \         oo
ooo               \     ooo
oooooo         oooooo
ooooooooo

The point is that a third is not defined based on how you make it, but
based on how big it is. If three identical pieces put together make up
a whole, then those pieces are thirds. Three different pieces, or
three pieces that don't add up to a whole, are not necessarily thirds.

Note also that this defines "fraction" in this specific mathematical
sense. In everyday language we can use the word in other ways, such
as "only a fraction of the population understands math well." We can
even talk about one child getting the "bigger half" of a pie. But
when we are writing a fraction using a numerator and denominator, the
denominator has to indicate a number of equal pieces into which a
whole can be cut, and the numerator is the number of those pieces
chosen.

Does that help to clarify things?

- Doctor Peterson, The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
```

```
Date: 05/09/2003 at 20:54:04
From: Doctor Dotty
Subject: Re: Fractions

Hi Phil,

Thanks for the question.

The textbook definition is correct, for this reason:

Here is a pie split up into bits of different sizes:

* | *
*     |   1 *
|   -
*        |   4    *
11  |_ _ _ _ _
*     --   \    1   *
20    \   -
*           \  5  *
\
*           *
*   *

Each piece is a fraction of the whole.

11/20 is "11 equal parts of a whole"
1/5 is "1 part of a whole"
1/4 is "1 part of a whole"

Together, if you add them all up, you do indeed get a whole.

The definition was slightly confusing though, I agree, as it could
be taken (as I suspect you did) as meaning that all fractions
regarding the same whole have to have the same denominator - rather
than you can't have two different denominators in the same fraction.

A better way of defining a fraction could be:

"A number written in the form a/b where both a and b are integers."

Does that make sense?

If I can help any more with this problem or any other, please write
back.

- Doctor Dotty, The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
```
Associated Topics:
Elementary Definitions
Elementary Fractions

Search the Dr. Math Library:

 Find items containing (put spaces between keywords):   Click only once for faster results: [ Choose "whole words" when searching for a word like age.] all keywords, in any order at least one, that exact phrase parts of words whole words

Submit your own question to Dr. Math
Math Forum Home || Math Library || Quick Reference || Math Forum Search