History of Exponent NotationDate: 11/03/2003 at 11:23:22 From: Lauren Subject: history of the exponent Why is the symbol for exponents a smaller number above the base? How did it become this? What is the history of it? Date: 11/03/2003 at 12:36:21 From: Doctor Peterson Subject: Re: history of the exponent Hi, Lauren. There's a good source for this kind of information listed in our FAQ: Earliest uses of mathematical symbols http://jeff560.tripod.com/mathsym.html Look under "symbols of operation". Among other things, it says: Nicole Oresme (c. 1323-1382) used numbers to indicate powering in the fourteenth century, although he did not use raised numbers. Nicolas Chuquet (1445?-1500?) used raised numbers in Le Triparty en la Science des Nombres in 1484. However, in Chuquet's notation, 3 3 12 actually meant 12x (Cajori vol. 1, page 102). In 1634, Pierre Hérigone (or Herigonus) (1580-1643) wrote a, a2, a3, etc., in Cursus Mathematicus, which was published in several volumes from 1634 to 1637; the numerals were not raised, however (Cajori vol. 1, page 202, and Ball). In 1636 James Hume used Roman numerals as exponents in L'Algèbre de Viète d'vne methode novelle, claire, et Facile. Cajori writes (vol. 1, pages 345-346): In 1636 James Hume brought out an edition of the algebra of Vieta, in which he introduced a superior notation, writing down the base and elevating the exponent to a position above the regular line and a little to the right. The exponent was iii 3 expressed in Roman numerals. Thus, he wrote A for A . Except for the use of Roman numerals, one has here our modern notation. Thus, this Scotsman, residing in Paris, had almost hit upon the exponential symbolism which has become universal through the writings of Descartes. In 1637 exponents in the modern notation (although with positive integers only) were used by Rene Descartes (1596-1650) in Geometrie. Descartes tended not to use 2 as an exponent, however, 2 usually writing aa rather than a , perhaps because aa occupies no 2 less space than a . As you see, lots of other ideas were floating around while algebraic notation was first being developed, and this one survived because it had some very strong advantages. One that I like is the asymmetry of the notation; if a notation like "a^b" were used, as we do in our e-mail and in some programming languages, then it would make people expect the operation to be commutative, like a+b = b+a, whereas it is NOT true that a^b = b^a. So putting the exponent off the line makes it clear that it is to be treated differently from other numbers in an expression. A disadvantage of the notation, of course, is that it is hard to type, and does not fit in an ordinary line of type in a book. (That's why exponents are commonly printed in a smaller size, though: to attempt to fit them in!) Fortunately, today word-processors can handle complicated notations fairly easily. If you have any further questions, feel free to write back. - Doctor Peterson, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/ |
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]
Ask Dr. Math^{TM}
© 1994- The Math Forum at NCTM. All rights reserved.
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/