Square Centimeters and Centimeters SquaredDate: 07/09/2004 at 18:30:23 From: Alana Subject: Square centimeter abbreviation: 1 cm^2 vs. 1^s cm If it's pronounced "1 square centimeter" why is it abbreviated 1 cm^2? My Dad said that 1 centimeter squared is much bigger than 1 square centimeter. I don't get it. What's most confusing about it is that when it is not abbreviated it is square centimeter, but when it is abbreviated it is centimeter squared. Why don't they just say 1^s cm? The ^s would stand for square and it would be much easier to understand. Date: 07/09/2004 at 23:00:36 From: Doctor Peterson Subject: Re: Square centimeter abbreviation: 1 cm^2 vs. 1^s cm Hi, Alana. Actually, a "centimeter squared" is the _definition_ of a "square centimeter" (though I think I know why your father said what he did, and I'll mention that later). Let me go through the ideas involved slowly. The name "square centimeter" came before the notation, which is why we read it differently than it looks in symbols; but there's also good reason not to read it as "centimeters squared", though there's good reason for the symbolic form we use. An area is measured as if we were cutting out lots of little paper squares one centimeter on a side, and seeing how many it takes to cover a region. We call each of those a "square centimeter" because it is a square corresponding to the linear unit called a centimeter. Eventually someone (I don't know when or where) realized that if you treat units as if they were variable names (in algebra), multiplying and dividing them along with the numbers, you could easily see the units used in the result of a calculation. For example, if you multiply a time in hours by a speed in kilometers per hour, you get the distance in kilometers: km 4 hr * 5 km/hr = 4 * 5 * hr * -- = 20 km hr since the "hr" in the numerator and denominator "cancel". When you do that with an area, say of a 4 by 5 centimeter rectangle, you get this: 4 cm * 5 cm = 4 * 5 * cm * cm = 20 cm^2 while we know that the area is 20 square centimeters. That is, the "square centimeter" comes out as "centimeters squared". What does that mean? It means that a square centimeter can be thought of as the product of a centimeter times a centimeter; which of course it is, since you find the area of a one-centimeter square by squaring the length of its side, which is 1 cm. So the unit we've long called a square centimeter can be thought of as the square of a centimeter, and written as cm^2. Now, why not switch over and just read it as "centimeters squared"? This is where your father's comment comes in. Suppose I called the area of that rectangle above "20 centimeters squared". We've just observed that one centimeter squared is the area of a one-centimeter square. So it sounds like 20 centimeters squared should be the area of a 20-centimeter square. But that's a lot larger; it's actually 400 cm^2, since you have to multiply 20 by 20 to find the area. So if we read the area that way, we would have to keep in mind that we mean 20 (centimeter squared)s rather than (20 centimeters) squared. That just doesn't make good English. So we keep the old wording 20 square centimeters which can only be interpreted one way. Here are some pages you and your father will find interesting: Defining a Square Centimeter http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/60392.html Meters Squared or Square Meters? http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/sets/select/dm_m_squared.html If you have any further questions, feel free to write back. - Doctor Peterson, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/ |
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]
Ask Dr. Math^{TM}
© 1994- The Math Forum at NCTM. All rights reserved.
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/